This is a common response when the "type" doesn't fit our theology/viewpoint. If we were to use your concept of only using types where it is explicitly noted we would have very few types/shadows. However the Word does tell us that the law was a schoolmaster leading us to Christ, which would indicate to me that there are many types and shadows in the OT that we should study.
It doesn't indicate that to me. The schoolmaster has already brought us to Christ so to go back and try to find the form from the shadow seems backwards to me.
It doesn't indicate that to me. The schoolmaster has already brought us to Christ so to go back and try to find the form from the shadow seems backwards to me.
So........ are you one who believes that since Christ has appeared and the NT has been written that we no longer need the OT?
Hybrid Mode
