Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old 01-21-2009, 12:04 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Covering:Veil or Hair: Part II? Answers Inside

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447 View Post
According to what?

1Co 11:7 For a man should not have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God. But the woman is the glory of the man.(NO SYMBOL)
1Co 11:8 For man did not come from woman, but woman from man.
1Co 11:9 Neither was man created for the sake of woman, but woman for man.
1Co 11:10 For this reason a woman should have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. (Which are ministers of God when you approach him)

Submission is realized in many aspects of our life and the covering is clearly the very sign of such acceptance of her authority and the lack of covering the acceptance of his authority according to creation in the body of Christ.
Then show me in the bible, outside of rebuke, that the word commanded women to wear coverings.

You can find rebukes in the bible about killing, and that is because there is a commandment in the bible that says to not kill.

To command the covering in 1 Cor 11 is to command something not laid out in scripture. You cannot rebuke someone for something God requires in and of itself if God never stated He required it in scripture. Paul was rebuking them for something God never laid out in scripture. But the reason he did it was for the same reason he rebuked people for eating meats offered to idols in sight of those who would be offended by it. You refuse to see that point.

Why did Paul rebuke people for eating meats before those offended? Because meats in and of themselves were forbidden by God? No. He did not forbid meats due to the meat in and of itself. He forbid them due to the issue of offenses. That is why Paul said meat is only meat and it does not empower a false god, nor does it diminish from our relationship with God. Paul taught such things when there was no singular command against them. That is the case for the veil. Unless you can give me a passage that commands a veil in scripture, outside a rebuke similar to that over meats, then I am satisfied with my conclusions whether anyone else is or not.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Christian Headcovering Or Veil ? Scott Hutchinson Fellowship Hall 29 12-12-2012 02:13 PM
If the Long Hair is a covering Praxeas Fellowship Hall 87 09-13-2012 06:31 PM
Beyond the Veil OneAccord Fellowship Hall 11 12-30-2007 02:11 PM
2 veil or not 2 veil berkeley Fellowship Hall 25 06-29-2007 11:02 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.