Quote:
Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace*
Yes, you should study it. It really is a standard that was based on a custom of our society. Custom changed, we made a 'law' against it. The Bible nowhere requires men and women to dress drastically different from each other.
The pants rule is very inconsistent. What about gauchos? I don't see men wearing those, and yet they are still forbidden on women. I wasn't even allowed to wear culottes, or shorts under my dress except for p.e.
It is a OP law that really needs re-evaluation.
|
Church reacted because people wearing pants 70 years ago were feminists/flapper-type gals. I agree, though, that pants on women do not bear that same symbolic meaning anymore.
Anyone ever wonder, though, why the fuss over Hillary wearing pants too often, and Laura Bush being more celebrated as a lady? Again, nothing to form a doctrine on, but worth considering.
Threaded Mode
