One has to know the nature of the TR. It is a work of gaining the NT text from several Gr. MSS. So the question does not fit. MT is much simpler, and yes to the MT.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy
What do you mean by "the question does not fit"?
Bump for Blume.
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
Come on, Timmy. lol. These agnostic hijackings are getting a bit much. lol
Read THE KING JAMES VERSION DEFENDED, as noted before.
__________________ ...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
I agree with the author on this issue, and he really answers the questions you raise in a very indepth manner.
__________________ ...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Uhhh, remind me, how did you send it to me, again? Email? Link in PM? Looks like it's another victim of my hard drive crash.
Found it. I'll bump it up on my list of things to read/view. (Sorry, Miz. ) I can't wait to find out that the MT and the TR are perfect word-for-word copies of the original manuscripts! Er, well, the MT is, I mean. I want to find out why the question doesn't fit, for the TR.
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
You beat me to it, Timmy. I just recalled I emailed it to you.
__________________ ...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
I'll bump it up on my list of things to read/view. (Sorry, Miz. 
) I can't wait to find out that the MT and the TR are perfect word-for-word copies of the original manuscripts! Er, well, the MT is, I mean. I want to find out why the question doesn't fit, for the TR. 
Hybrid Mode
