Way To Make Us Proud Ms. Angle! - Page 4

canam · #31 10-10-2010, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp

The burden of proof is on you. We think you are not telling the truth. It is up to you to prove it.

Wrong thats what google is for.besides i dont know how.And PS the christain faiths dont advocate killing those who dont beleive like them and they dont stone you for hanging out with a girl or boy etc etc.

Twisp · #32 10-10-2010, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by canam

Wrong thats what google is for.besides i dont know how.And PS the christain faiths dont advocate killing those who dont beleive like them and they dont stone you for hanging out with a girl or boy etc etc.

So we can safely assume that you are not telling the truth, since you have no proof. Good to know. We can note this on your future posts.

As far as this, perhaps you should check the Bible again.

Quote:

And PS the christain faiths dont advocate killing those who dont beleive like them

Um, yes they do. God allowed the Israelites to slaughter whole cities in the Old Testament, and all unbelievers will be punished eternally according to Revelations at the end time.

Quote:

they dont stone you for hanging out with a girl or boy etc etc.

God had no problem stoning people once before, what makes you think He won't go back to that method of punishment?

canam · #33 10-10-2010, 07:57 PM

We dont live in old testament, but i suspect you know that. Maybe.

Twisp · #34 10-10-2010, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by canam

We dont live in old testament, but i suspect you know that. Maybe.

Revelations isn't in the Old Testament. Care to try again?

As far as stoning, the God that sanctioned it then hasn't changed, has He? He was okay with it then, He could just as easily start calling for that again.

coadie · #35 10-10-2010, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by canam

Pictures and video online look it up

Liberal eye glasses create very large blind spots.

You can't prove something to a liberal. They are bound by emotion and go by feelings and avoid facts.

coadie · #36 10-10-2010, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp

I find it ironic. She is paranoid about foreign religions imposing their beliefs on our government systems, yet she doesn't believe that the Constitution requires separation of church and state. A lack of separation between church and state makes it much easier a belief system to be imposed on the general population.

Twisp makes dishonest claims about what others say and believe. That is what liberals are taught to do.
If you have no argument, make something up they say.

Twisp · #37 10-10-2010, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coadie

Twisp makes dishonest claims about what others say and believe. That is what liberals are taught to do.
If you have no argument, make something up they say.

You must have missed my earlier post. Here it is again, so you can see that she does not believe in separation of church and state:

Quote:

I am not making anything up.

"Ralston pressed Angle on her comments to the state Assembly in 1995 that the “tenet of the separation of church and state is an unconstitutional doctrine.” When Ralston insisted that the separation of church and state is indeed in the Constitution, Angle disagreed.

“No it doesn’t, Jon. No it doesn’t,” Angle said. “Actually, Thomas Jefferson has been misquoted like I’ve been misquoted out of context.”

lol, you should research some before you make statements. It helps.

Now with link goodness:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/39210.html

Twisp · #38 10-10-2010, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coadie

Liberal eye glasses create very large blind spots.

You can't prove something to a liberal. They are bound by emotion and go by feelings and avoid facts.

You definitely can't prove something to anyone without any facts.

In this case, canam has not produced any facts to back up his claim. Logic leads us to the conclusion that he is not telling the truth.

We shall note this, and remember that for his future posts.

canam · #39 10-11-2010, 05:05 AM

Wrong Twispy, i just refuse to get into a battle of wits with the unarmed.

coadie · #40 10-11-2010, 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twisp

You definitely can't prove something to anyone without any facts.

In this case, canam has not produced any facts to back up his claim. Logic leads us to the conclusion that he is not telling the truth.

We shall note this, and remember that for his future posts.

Is this an example of what the drones call facts?

Quote:

Obamacare is the most stupendous, fantastic program of all time! Marvel at the One’s genius as he tells us how “reform” will lower health insurance premiums 3000%!

Liberals don't provide facts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUd-s...layer_embedded

We will keep this in mind for twispies future claims.