Has evolutionism become a leading religion?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by pelathais

My Miller/Levine link was added to provide a greater scope just how the clotting mechanism evolved. Your unattributed citation of Behe is how you introduced the topic.

While stealing Behe's own words in an attempt to refute "Darwinism," you continue to ignore the very plain and evident fact that Michael Behe is a Darwinist himself.

End of story... unless you can deal with it.

The quotes came from miller levine which you provided.
They admit they have no actual blood samples.
Fossils don't give blood samples and darwiniasts think they know what the samples would show.

That folks is not science. It is voodoo and speculation.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by coadie

The quotes came from miller levine which you provided.
They admit they have no actual blood samples.
Fossils don't give blood samples and darwiniasts think they know what the samples would show.

That folks is not science. It is voodoo and speculation.

Miller and Levine discuss a methodology involving gene research whereby mutations which occur at known rates can be extrapolated into the past.

YOUR original quote was taken from Behe. Man up.