Has evolutionism become a leading religion?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by coadie

Again, so the blood clotting is all in that disturbed mind?
R F doolittle is drawing a blank also.

I did quote your link from miller and levine. I guess you are wrong that it comes from BEHE?

You are getting too desparate and may need some time to catch your breath.



so the Darwinsitas are bleeding on the blood clotting claim?


http://www.slideshare.net/leafwarbler/csu-fresno

Here are slides on clotting today but none on evolution of clotting.

See these people would need some actural multimillion year old blood and we know they can't show it. so they speculate.

Lie for Darwin. It is all extrapolation and presupposition. No proof. No evidence.

Pelthais drinks the dishonest claims.

My Miller/Levine link was added to provide a greater scope just how the clotting mechanism evolved. Your unattributed citation of Behe is how you introduced the topic.

While stealing Behe's own words in an attempt to refute "Darwinism," you continue to ignore the very plain and evident fact that Michael Behe is a Darwinist himself.

End of story... unless you can deal with it.