Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
You seemed to
Because I'm a Christian saved by the blood of Christ and not by the works of the law
|
Yes.. but what does that have anything to do with what I have said? The whole law is fulfilled by love does that mean the teachings of God are to be ignored? NO!
Quote:
|
I don't unless it is repeated in the NT as I said before.
|
That is your perogative. teaching principles of divine order is always true.
So you say nobody disagrees with Crossdressing and you don't teach it unless it is in the NT. So teach on crossdressing Prax from the NT with didactic scripture.
Quote:
|
You are confusing being righteous or commandments by God and "understanding of God" or who God is.
|
no I am not confusing anything. The bible is God expressed and it teaches no matter the covenant.
Quote:
|
Right and you used the word distinctions in clothing and I repeat, show me someone here that denies there should be a distinction in clothing.
|
again... I am discussing Blumes interpretation on what
Deut 22:5 is in reference to that it is not limited to warrior gear etc...
Quote:
|
Nobody denies a distinction in clothing
|
really... so show me in the NT distinction taught in clothing since you aer stuck on somehow because a page divide says NT it somewho negates natural law truths.
Threaded Mode
