Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
Zimmy?
"And from what I've heard he did".
Do you realize you just disqualified yourself from jury duty? You are being just as biased in this case as you are claiming others to be.
|
So does Limbaugh or anyone else who participates in public commentary using their real name.
I started this thread, using my real name.
My desire is to encourage awareness and discussion, not to get on jury duty.
Oh and I am not being biased as I claim others to be. No Ma'am.
With what has been presented to the public, with zimrod's quip, "Those ****** always get away," and with everything else presented so far, it is a very safe
assumption (if you want to call it such) that zimwit didn't back down when he was told to, that he accosted and harrased a young man (still a minor) minding his own business and when the minor defended himself, he was killed.
Again, the law that zim hopes to find protection in was never meant to be used to shield a person sho starts a fight with someone and then kills that person because the other person defended themselves when they were approached first.
How is it so difficult to see that if zim had simply NOT approached the 17 year old MINOR that none of this would be happening?
The notion that he "looked like suspicious" even looked like a suspicious man doesn't hold up.
In cases of statutory rape, does the argument, "Well she looked like she was old enough" hold any water?
Whatever...
Threaded Mode
