The Real Delegate Count - it's not over

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin

So Obama doesn't double-speak? Nah, that's right, He just out and out lies and when you refuse to vote and he wins....guess what! you voted for him.

I hear all the things said about Romney, (and he wasn't my first pick) but where is your outspokenness about Obama. Seems somewhat hypocritical! Oh well, some wouldn't change their mind if Jesus appeared and told them who to vote for. And yes, I have changed and will change again when it's for the best of my country. And Obama "ain't" what's best for our country.

Whoever said anything about supporting Obama? You can go back on this very forum in regards to Obama's election and find out ALL the information I posted against him. There is no point bringing him up again. It's been done. It's been said. It's been exhausted.

But, please take note that this fear mongering of Obama getting another four years is pure fear mongering.

For instance, look at the ruling in this case. We do have people fighting for our Constitutional rights.

Judge Strikes Down NDAA, Rules Obama Must Obey Constitution

Signed very quietly into law on New Year’s Eve, the controversial Act has been roundly criticized as unconstitutional by groups on both the political left and right. Of greatest concern was Section 1021, which grants the United States military authority to exercise police powers on American soil. Upon order of the president and at his sole discretion, agents of the military are empowered to detain “until the end of hostilities” anyone the president believes to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda, the Taliban, or “associated forces.”

http://www.westernjournalism.com/jud...-constitution/

This is what I want - I want a Constitutional fight with Obama. I want a real conservative to run in 2016. We wont' have that if Romney wins.

And if Paul can bring us a Brokered Convention, I would like to see this happen after the continued vetting of Romney - Does that mean that if Romney were prevented from gaining the 1,144 votes necessary for nomination, then Ron Paul would therefore become the nominee? No. But if he would, it would be so much better than succumbing to the candidate that those national saboteurs who gave us Obama now want.

Actually, the candidate who would likely be seen as the classic compromise acceptable to enough present Romney and Paul leaners on the convention floor would be Newt Gingrich. Gingrich, unlike Romney, has promised to reverse Obama’s Marxofascist, globalist Executive Orders, including all the “Czar” appointments and his Agenda 21 and EPA EO’s.