|
Re: Bernard continues his rewrite of UPC history
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
He seems to have a vested interest in making that number as small as possible, even going so far as to say that one could not effectively hold that view in the UPC today.
|
Even with the fundamental doctrine statement being revised in 1973, a one-stepper could say he agreed with it. The motion to accept the revision was proposed by a three-stepper and seconded by a one-stepper. The fundamental doctrine statement was written as ambiguously as it was in order to accommodate both one-steppers and three-steppers.
__________________
Sam also known as Jim Ellis
Apostolic in doctrine
Pentecostal in experience
Charismatic in practice
Non-denominational in affiliation
Inter-denominational in fellowship
|
Threaded Mode
