Bernard continues his rewrite of UPC history

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Max Cosme

The final one is the best example of Bernard's shoddy methodology. He borrows a quote from an Ellis Scism book where Scism says a "minority" held that view. Bernard then takes the liberty to decide that Scism would only make this observation if it was about 1/3 to 1/4 of the PCI.

This type of statistical methodology would be laughed at by any serious scholar.

He's trying to prove that his position is the "right" one and believed by an overwhelming majority back in 1945. He and others have redefined what they consider to be Apostolic or Pentecostal.