Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
The ones who formed the canon chose books that agreed with their own understanding of theology. I should say "canons", plural, since there are several different ones in use today. Some sects of Christianity use pretty much the same New Testament that Houston describes, if I recall correctly. They don't even have the OT in their Bible.
|
When I responded to the gospel at the young age of 14, I began to read the family bible. I got the warm fuzzies, even when I read the Apocryphal books. I had no idea that there was a Catholic Bible, a KJV, etc.
In some remote parts of the world (think villages, tribal people, etc) you will find people ripping pages out of a Bible. Everyone wants a written copy of the "word" of God, yet there are not enough bibles to pass out.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tommy
But really, every Christian does this. Chooses a set of books they agree with, and call it their Bible. It's just that most nowadays decide on a Bible in a more subtle way: they choose the one that the founders of their sect have already chosen. They chose a Bible by choosing a sect.
|
That is common. I think it is more common to pick certain books within canon and ignore the rest.
Threaded Mode
