The Apostolic New Testament soon to be published! - Page 11

Arphaxad · #**101** 02-06-2013, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

I personally don't believe Matt 28:19 is original. Humans by nature tend to hang with similar phrasing. nowhere is anything like Matt 28:19 remotely used anywhere in scripture except at the end of Matt. Mark nor Luke allude to such language nor do the Apostles use such language a pronouncing of authority. Some ask what proof do you have? Well besides some references that many know about by later figures to Matt 28:19 to be "in my name" I have nothing from a textual evidence. Internal evidence is very strong against it as many have pointed out. Also we don't have the originals and the ones we do have are after church and state unification. So if evidence was destroyed of the original for the later rendering what can you say if that is your only criteria. Can't have that as we MUST have canon or it's all a lie nothing can be trusted blah blah blah.

Why didn't they change Acts 2:38 too?

Timmy · #**102** 02-06-2013, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houston

There was no canon other than the O.T.

OK, then, did he mean "the sixty-six books that will be collected at some time in the future and called 'The Bible'"?

Timmy · #**103** 02-06-2013, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timmy

OK, then, did he mean "the sixty-six books that will be collected at some time in the future and called 'The Bible'"?

2 Tim 3:16. Same question.

Peacemaker · #**104** 02-07-2013, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Let's hope you weren't the editor...

LifeUncommon · #**105** 02-07-2013, 02:17 PM

This is something to be ashamed of - not something to be proud of.

Esther · #**106** 02-07-2013, 05:55 PM

I missed this thread when it first came out.

You guys can sure beard on a fellow.

I will probably get a copy as I love to study different points of view.

DB I need you to edit my books

Peacemaker · #**107** 02-07-2013, 08:19 PM

I have a hard time believing that Flaming Z isn't pulling our collective legs with these posts. If you all (whoever you refer to when you say "we") are serious, would you Mind giving us your organization's or society's name? Who are the scholars providing this work? Where did they study, etc?

FlamingZword · #**108** 02-12-2013, 04:04 PM

Finally "The Holy Apostolic New Testament" Version 2000 is finished.
We started working on this version in 1999, and expected to finish in 2000, that is why it is named Version 2000.

The Holy Apostolic New Testament will be published by the Christian Apostolic Press.

We are currently in the process of setting up a paypal account and expect to have the first published print copies this month.

We plan to issue a 2nd edition perhaps in a couple of years depending on several factors.

navygoat1998 · #**109** 02-12-2013, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

Finally "The Holy Apostolic New Testament" Version 2000 is finished.
We started working on this version in 1999, and expected to finish in 2000, that is why it is named Version 2000.

The Holy Apostolic New Testament will be published by the Christian Apostolic Press.

We are currently in the process of setting up a paypal account and expect to have the first published print copies this month.

We plan to issue a 2nd edition perhaps in a couple of years depending on several factors.

The Jehovah Witnesses, Mormons and now Oneness Apostolic each have their own version of the bible. Look at the company you keep.