Quote:
Originally Posted by Wang Mo Shi
Prove it! You need to rightly divide all New Testament refrences to hair, and it becomes obivious that the problem in many of the churches was that the hair was broidered. That is how the head is not covered, and the hair is not yet cut. As I have repeated several times, the hair is the covering, and if it is an UpDo, it is broidered, and the head is not covered.
Nowhere in any of the three major NT hair references do the Apostles ever refer to a man made veil covering the head being a problem. If they did-Please show me!
|
circular argument alert!
The word for covered/uncovered refers to an artificial object put on top of the head.
Rightly dividing involves methods you don't use...
Context
Grammar
Author and audience
History.
That means you must read the verse in relation to the surrounding text. Rightly undefstand the grammar including the original language. Who wrote it and to whom. What was the historical setting at the time it was written.
Lastly one needs to understand types of speech