Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 03-12-2013, 04:57 PM
navygoat1998's Avatar
navygoat1998 navygoat1998 is offline
Repent and believe the Gospel!


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,090
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447 View Post
outward holiness is a rather vague way of saying things. As outward is all expressions of the heart whether in clothing or conversation etc... Baptism not being a salvational aspect is based on what? Baptism is seen as a work? I won't put words in your mouth.



Do you believe you are saved AT the sinners prayer? Life of repentance vs that initial salvation or coming in to covenant are two different things. Also do you believe you are judged by that fruit unto eternal life?



good



walking away is relative and vague. Lukewarm is not walking away completely. Which even then depends as I could argue it is walking away in part.





not far from what I expected.
I was worried because I would hope that I don't believe much like yourself.
__________________
Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. (Romans 14:4)

Scripture is its own interpreter. Nothing can cut a diamond but a diamond. Nothing can interpret Scripture but Scripture" Thomas Watson.
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 03-12-2013, 04:59 PM
navygoat1998's Avatar
navygoat1998 navygoat1998 is offline
Repent and believe the Gospel!


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,090
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
...and yet Paul spent a great deal of time telling people how to live as Christians. Some of it was offered as his own opinion as to a better way to be (like marriage, and/or staying single). Others was dealing with very specific problems in a particular congregation (like "women be silent). and others was addressed to everyone who is a christian (like can you sin? God FORBID and 1 Cor 11 the hair chapter).

No, Paul was not a legalist. Paul understood a balance between living by the letter of the law, and placing restrictions on the behavior of christians which is what the OP world does when it is right.

Paul was not doing as you suggest.... as for justification...."how were you baptised?" "Have you recieved the Holy Ghost since you believed?"

His words, not mine...

peace my friend.
Ferd do believe that if your wife cuts her hair and puts on a pair of pants while wearing makeup she would go to hell?
__________________
Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. (Romans 14:4)

Scripture is its own interpreter. Nothing can cut a diamond but a diamond. Nothing can interpret Scripture but Scripture" Thomas Watson.

Last edited by navygoat1998; 03-12-2013 at 05:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 03-12-2013, 05:05 PM
navygoat1998's Avatar
navygoat1998 navygoat1998 is offline
Repent and believe the Gospel!


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 3,090
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Martin Luther also believed we are saved by Grace through Faith and yet still taught baptism was necessary
In fact, Luther called for the death of those Anabaptists who outspokenly believed in Justification by faith alone in Christ and practiced believers baptism and not baptismal regeneration.

Could be a hangover from the Catholic church???
__________________
Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. (Romans 14:4)

Scripture is its own interpreter. Nothing can cut a diamond but a diamond. Nothing can interpret Scripture but Scripture" Thomas Watson.

Last edited by navygoat1998; 03-12-2013 at 05:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 03-12-2013, 09:02 PM
Praxeas's Avatar
Praxeas Praxeas is offline
Go Dodgers!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by navygoat1998 View Post
In fact, Luther called for the death of those Anabaptists who outspokenly believed in Justification by faith alone in Christ and practiced believers baptism and not baptismal regeneration.

Could be a hangover from the Catholic church???
Or later evangelicals misunderstood what the reformers taught about faith and works.

Btw I've read Calvin also believed it was necessary. What about Wesley?

Isn't the evangelical view rather new?
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:


  1. There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
  2. The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
  3. Every sinner must repent of their sins.
  4. That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
  5. That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
  6. The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 03-12-2013, 09:14 PM
AreYouReady? AreYouReady? is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,600
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447 View Post
outward holiness is a rather vague way of saying things. As outward is all expressions of the heart whether in clothing or conversation etc... Baptism not being a salvational aspect is based on what? Baptism is seen as a work? I won't put words in your mouth.
Brother, I am going to try to choose my words carefully here.

If the words in bold are true, then some people's conversation and actions betray what they wear in their attempt to 'express' their holiness outwardly.
__________________
It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man. (Psalms 118:8)
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 03-12-2013, 09:16 PM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by AreYouReady? View Post
Brother, I am going to try to choose my words carefully here.

If the words in bold are true, then some people's conversation and actions betray what they wear in their attempt to 'express' their holiness outwardly.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 03-13-2013, 06:22 AM
LUKE2447 LUKE2447 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,730
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by AreYouReady? View Post
Brother, I am going to try to choose my words carefully here.

If the words in bold are true, then some people's conversation and actions betray what they wear in their attempt to 'express' their holiness outwardly.
yeah... that is common sense. Contradiction whether short term or a lifestyle is human nature. The principle is still the same no matter the failure of man to hold up or not the basic truths. Holiness is a complete aspect of a person in ALL things. To negate any aspect of man's being inward or outward to holiness is false doctrine. hypocrite or not. Truth is truth no matter the failure of it's messenger.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 03-13-2013, 06:25 AM
LUKE2447 LUKE2447 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,730
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Or later evangelicals misunderstood what the reformers taught about faith and works.

Btw I've read Calvin also believed it was necessary. What about Wesley?

Isn't the evangelical view rather new?
Luther was all over the place. He was antinomian at one time then toward the end of his life started turning away from his previous stances.
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:37 AM
Ferd's Avatar
Ferd Ferd is offline
I remain the Petulant Chevalier


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,524
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by navygoat1998 View Post
Ferd do believe that if your wife cuts her hair and puts on a pair of pants while wearing makeup she would go to hell?
So now we are going to get into a discussion about what you have rejected to see if I "line up"?

The difference between us is not in my view of "if a woman cuts her hair will she go to hell" but in the fact that you found some stuff taught by some people that you didnt agree with.... so you rejected all doctrine taught by those guys and found some new belief system to replace the old.

I didnt. I find great comfort in the doctrine and I have no need to reject doctrine, when I find some man misapplying it in some way.

Since we are asking questions, do you believe it is proper...that a person can be saved... by rejecting entire passages of scripture and just ignoring them?

if the tone here comes accross as harsh, it is certainly not meant to be that way. please understand I dont want to be confrontational here.
__________________
If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
My Countdown Counting down to: Days left till the end of the opressive Texas Summer!
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:21 AM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Bombshell- Considering going back to the UPC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
The difference between us is not in my view of "if a woman cuts her hair will she go to hell" but in the fact that you found some stuff taught by some people that you didnt agree with.... so you rejected all doctrine taught by those guys and found some new belief system to replace the old.
Wrong.

Quote:
I didnt. I find great comfort in the doctrine and I have no need to reject doctrine, when I find some man misapplying it in some way.
Well, bless your heart.
Quote:
Since we are asking questions, do you believe it is proper...that a person can be saved... by rejecting entire passages of scripture and just ignoring them?
No. No one believes that. YOUR interpretation of scripture is what is rejected.
Quote:
if the tone here comes accross as harsh, it is certainly not meant to be that way. please understand I dont want to be confrontational here.


-P.R. Rep for NavyGoat
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UPC BOMBSHELL!!! Will '93 Affirmation be overturned?????? Thad The Tab 53 07-24-2013 10:54 AM
(((Bombshell Bombshell!!! Attention All Gossipmongers))) PreacherV Fellowship Hall 18 12-16-2007 09:03 PM
***Bombshell: ALJC vs. NCO Battle Royale: The NCO/AWCF strike back *** SDG The D.A.'s Office 97 10-17-2007 02:48 PM
What would it take for you to get back into the UPC??? Carpenter Fellowship Hall 224 03-24-2007 01:14 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.