Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
I don't remember what he said. I read a comment that it just proved TM inflicted some real damage in order for that to be the case.
What's your take?
|
I'll have to try to find it later. Depending on where the DNA from GZ is, it could help prove that TM was in fact landing blows.
I read some comments on Twitter yesterday about people not understanding what the female wit who testified yesterday about GZ's wounds was talking about. A lot of Twits stopped watching it for a while.
Reason I mention that is I just read a comment on Twitter from someone saying (paraphrase) Plz remind Pros how Jury took the long DNA testimony in the OJ trial.
I guess the person was suggesting that Jurys don't tend to listen well to the tedious, scientific testimony on DNA - like what's being done now.
Threaded Mode
