Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
That's not what the evidence shows. He was a neighborhood watch. He saw someone that looked suspicious and he called Police.
TM was staring at GZ, walked towards his truck with his hand in is waistband...
At that point GZ was doing what NH is supposed to do and it appears TM confronted GZ.
The evidence shows that TM hit GZ, knocked him down, straddled him MMA style "ground and pound" and was wailing away at his face. That is assault. He had no other injuries to suggest GZ ever struck him.
correct but there were witnesses including one eye witness
They are saying that because of the facts that came out in the Trial and in part by the prosecutions own witnesses that all corroborated GZ's initial story (which never changed) that TM attacked him. It has nothing to do with Christianity.
In fact Christians are supposed to love TRUTH not base their reasoning on subjective feelings
I don't believe that. What if GZ did not have a gun? He would have gotten beaten to a pulp and then so called Christians would say "GZ got what he deserved for the mistake he made"?
Punishment for what? He defended himself.
|
Also keep in mind that the detectives tried a ruse by lying and saying that a camera had caught the entire thing on tape. They were hoping that GZ would change his story and tell the truth to keep from being charged with lying to a police officer and impeding the investigation.
Zimmerman's answer: "Thank God!"
Threaded Mode
