Zimmerman not guilty!!!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

Thanks for your reasoned and informative response. #fail

You want to know what is really annoying about this case. The Martin family going around the talk show circuit speaking about how the jury would have convicted GZ IF they would have only known what a sweet loving child TM was.

The media and the Florida State Prosecution are going along with this lie.

They suppressed the information on his cell phone (which includes under age girl porn along with the drugs. street fighting, etc.), his FB comments, his YouTube subscriptions.

Anyone hanging him on a wall as a stellar example of a middle-class law abiding citizen are doing a grave disservice to this country and to the black community who need to honestly address the travesty of what his life really entailed - a mirror to a large portion of the youth.

It's funny that Thomas Sowell, Larry Elders, Walter Williams, Allen West, et al, (labeling them an Uncle Tom) want to address the real problem, but charlatans like Sharpton, Holder, Jackson, Melissa Perry, et al, want to keep Uncle Sam's Plantation going to line their pockets. Gag me with a spoon!

[FlamingZword]

The bias is incredible, the media still keeps on showing a 12 year innocent looking boy.

The media has plenty of more up to date photos of MT, but none of them paint him in a flattering pose.

They simple refuse to show newer photos.

[StillStanding]

Originally Posted by Sasha

Was the accused found guilty?

If you read the article, he was found NOT GUILTY!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

The evidence shows that TM hit GZ, knocked him down, straddled him MMA style "ground and pound" and was wailing away at his face. That is assault. He had no other injuries to suggest GZ ever struck him.

They are saying that because of the facts that came out in the Trial and in part by the prosecutions own witnesses that all corroborated GZ's initial story (which never changed) that TM attacked him. It has nothing to do with Christianity.

In fact Christians are supposed to love TRUTH not base their reasoning on subjective feelings.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by StillStanding

Also keep in mind that the detectives tried a ruse by lying and saying that a camera had caught the entire thing on tape. They were hoping that GZ would change his story and tell the truth to keep from being charged with lying to a police officer and impeding the investigation.

Zimmerman's answer: "Thank God!"

Exactly. It lent credibility to what GZ said

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by StillStanding

What say ye about THIS case?

In 2009 an adult shot a 17 year old kid whom the accused said charged him after he confronted the teen and 2 others for allegedly breaking into a car. Two witnesses (the other alleged car thieves) testified that the victim did not charge the accused per his story, but instead had his hands up.

What are your first thoughts? Was injustice done? Do you need more info and facts before you express and opinion because this could be a trick question? Do you want to hear what Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson said first before you express an opinion? Race? Well, isn't justice suppose to be blind?

http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top...tt-not-guilty/

Read the story on the link. Sound familiar?

Still want to know the race of the accused and the victim?





















The accused is black and the victim was white!

I would have to hear the facts and witnesses.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Sasha

Exactly when did he leave his vehicle? People are saying he did that AFTER being told not to follow, but that's not true. He had been told to follow at the beginning of this incident. The dispatch on the first call was asking him where he went, what was he wearing, etc. You can't answer those questions if you aren't following him.

The second dispatcher is the one who asked if he was following and when he said yes, he was told not to do that. He told the cops he was on his way back to his vehicle when he was confronted. So I'm puzzled why people keep saying he shouldn't have left the vehicle when he was on foot.

The dispatcher actually said "we don't need you to do that"

[n david]

He must not have watched the same Zimmerman trial I watched....

John Gray, a very popular youth speaker and a Pastor at Olsteen's church tweeted:

"Anybody familiar with the Darius Simmons shooting in Milwaukee? Very similar2what's been going on, with very different result. Check it out."

Only, it's not similar.....not at all!

This was an old white guy who shot a 12 year old black kid in cold blood. There's video of it. The old guy wasn't attacked. He wasn't defending himself. He wasn't injured in any way. It wasn't self-defense.

Why post lies like this? What purpose does it serve to try to link two completely different cases and say they're alike?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Sasha

Exactly when did he leave his vehicle? People are saying he did that AFTER being told not to follow, but that's not true. He had been told to follow at the beginning of this incident. The dispatch on the first call was asking him where he went, what was he wearing, etc. You can't answer those questions if you aren't following him.

The second dispatcher is the one who asked if he was following and when he said yes, he was told not to do that. He told the cops he was on his way back to his vehicle when he was confronted. So I'm puzzled why people keep saying he shouldn't have left the vehicle when he was on foot.

There was one dispatcher, not two. Only one call in which GZ was asked about TM's appearance and location, not two.

GZ was watching him from his truck. Did you watch the trial at all?

[StillStanding]

Originally Posted by StillStanding

What say ye about THIS case?

In 2009 an adult shot a 17 year old kid whom the accused said charged him after he confronted the teen and 2 others for allegedly breaking into a car. Two witnesses (the other alleged car thieves) testified that the victim did not charge the accused per his story, but instead had his hands up.

What are your first thoughts? Was injustice done? Do you need more info and facts before you express and opinion because this could be a trick question? Do you want to hear what Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson said first before you express an opinion? Race? Well, isn't justice suppose to be blind?

http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top...tt-not-guilty/

Read the story on the link. Sound familiar?

Still want to know the race of the accused and the victim?





















The accused is black and the victim was white!

The reason I posted this is because it is eerily similar to the Zimmerman case when you read how the jury deliberated for two days, how the parents say that the kid wasn't a troublemaker and was minding his own business, and were complaining that there was injustice in the court system.

Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson were nowhere to be found fighting this injustice from our courts for this family! Why? Because the victim was white, and the accused was black. It's just the opposite of the Zimmerman case.

This gives you perspective that chiming in on certain cases is not necessarily because of equality and injustice, but to keep their own names in the spotlight as leaders of the black community by race baiting.