Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcBee
Is that sarcasm, or a literal opinion of yours? Not so apparent (which one) considering the other comments in this thread, as well as your dismay at the decision to remove a possible psycho case to be medically evaluated. (Not that some congressmen aren't psychos too, but that's not the issue here--those others at least have the social sensitivity or intelligence to not get caught in this manner--except for the ones who do thankfully get similarly caught, a rarity.)
|
Folks need to pay attention to this: Marc, as an atheist/unbeliever, you apparently believe it highly likely that a person who makes a public interruption in order to deliver a religious rebuke to the 'powers that be' is a mental case, a 'possible psycho'.
This is the mentality that will not only allow, but support the persecution of Christians for 'mental illness', just as was done throughout the middle ages (they called it witchcraft or demon possession or having a familiar spirit back then) and in many communist regimes.