Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman
You're all over the place in this, prax. You said..."I can also say Persons don't die for three days then come back to life. Persons don't walk on water. etc etc. These are all naturalistic and normative views we have of what a Person is...until we talk about what and who God is and what He can do."
Now to me, and apparently I'm not understanding your position, that is saying that Jesus wasn't a person, that He was something unidentified, requiring more discussion.
|
No, that was me pointing out to someone else that when we compare God to Man we make a big mistake because in our NORMAL experience we don't walk on water. Do you? We never SEEN anyone walk on water. We don't die and three days later. it's not NORMAL.
So the fallacy is comparing Human PERSONS to GOD and expecting God to be LIKE us.
So no, I am not all over the place and no you didn't understand
Here is what I said in context
It's impossible because we ARE separate persons. We aren't talking about a possibility. I KNOW Jesus is God because the bible says so.
Quote:
God isn't defined existentially nor functionally by humans existentialism or functional ability.
I can also say Persons don't die for three days then come back to life. Persons don't walk on water. etc etc. These are all naturalistic and normative views we have of what a Person is...until we talk about what and who God is and what He can do.
|
Now, you'll need to follow what Jfrog said before you can understand the point that we can't compare God to man and go "Aha! If we can't do it. neither can God"