|
Re: Are All the Apostolics Gone from AFF?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
I have a feeling you will never find that study. I have heard that claim all my life and find it absurd.
Of course if a woman has on skin tight pants I could see it drawing a man's attention but with a normal pair of pants on vs a normal skirt / dress I can tell you that for me and I would guess a lot of men, I am much more apt to be "drawn to" a woman's legs, hips, etc when she is wearing a dress.
If you want to perpetuate an extra biblical rule about women not wearing pants be my guest but don't use absurd rationales for it. (said in a kind but bemused way you can't see in my writing. Please don't take this as me being ugly).
|
CC1 with all due respect, can you tell me why through history women's attire was a dress instead of men wearing a dress? I mean if you look at the whole first century robe discussion (most Christians believe they wore something like bathrobes) most of your unisex attire Christians claim both genders pretty much looked the same. Therefore why did the women end up with the dress? I honestly would like your thoughts on this question. 
__________________
"all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
~Declaration of Independence
|
Threaded Mode
