Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasha
This is exactly how errors in doctrine occur. Take an instance here, pull a definition from there, use an example over there, stir it up with lack of mention and VOILA!! You have serpent seed doctrine, snake handling doctrine, and no Jesus name baptism doctrine.
You also excuse women to do things that are also not mentioned in scripture with specifics you claim are lacking when it comes to women preaching. You say they can witness but I don't see where a woman in scripture ever did that. You said they can prophesy but I don't see a woman prophesying in the NT.
You can have it both ways. If you just stick to what scripture says and not add your own interpretation to it, you can't go wrong.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasha
Sis. Alvear has stated several times that she isn't a preacher. Unlike Pliny, I'm not going to quote her multiple posts where she says this, but perhaps he will if you need them.
|
Ladies and gentleman, please delete all occasions of Jesus name baptism in your Bibles, go out and buy some snakes, and subscribe to the serpent seed doctrine, while Sashha tries to find missionary, and then to double her jeopardy, she is going too try to find a female missionary in the Bible.
Is this the same woman who needed to have "specifics in scripture so we would not subscribe to serpent seed, snake handling, and no Jesus name baptism."
I see her requirements are only for others, however she did try to explain away the direct quote from scripture, its usage in other places, and its definitions from the Greek, as well as the glaring facts of no woman evangelist, missionary, priest, apostle chosen by Christ, qualifications for female bishops or deacons.
Threaded Mode
