Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
It doesn't matter whether moral or doctrinal failure, Epley claimed if SP doesn't repent, he's condemned. And I'll give it a rest when Epley stops using innuendo suggesting a sin has been committed.
Rev. Epley:
I don't disagree with you much. In fact, this may be one of the first times I've taken issue with what you've posted. I apologize for any rudeness in my responses.
I ask you, because you continue even this morning to post with innuendo and ambiguity, why is SP condemned if he doesn't repent? Or yet, why does SP need to repent? What sin has he committed?
|
You are reading into what I am posting. Jewelry is a sin. Women wearing pants is a sin you get the drift.
Threaded Mode
