Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam
My data is just fine. Still standing. Want some more sources? There are jillions of them and they all say the same thing and give the same ages - 7 in delaware and 10 in 25 other states. Because in Delaware, you had to swear in as a Christian to be a lawmaker and that is also from a reputable source.
So what society today defines to be perversion was, right or wrong in your eyes, acceptable in the past.
This acceptance in the past does not seem to be religious in nature.
For you, as a Christian, to call what a Muslim did 1450 years ago a perversion vs. Christianity and Christian beliefs then you need to conclusively demonstrate that this was a perversion in the eyes of God from the beginning of Christianity. Crack that book of yours open and go.
I know this: I am in no position to declare what is or is not perversion other than what the words in the books declare to be perversion. One of the things that is declared to be perversion in both your book and mine is standing on behalf of God and declaring judgement on a person or action with no written basis behind it. Doing so puts oneself in God's position and this is both a dangerous and perverted act.
|
Okay YOUR answer is that an old man marrying a 6 year old girl is NOT perversion.
What a despicable religion you have.
Oh and BTW I think ANYONE marerying a 6 year old is SICK!!! I could care less if he calls himself a Christian or a Muslim Prophet.
As a "holy man" (which he surely was NOT) he should be set to a higher standard. Also, since he is the one Mulsims look up to and seek to emulate this perversion is part of the Islamic tradition.
Jesus on the other hand was HOLY and sets a far higher standard and is therefore a much better person to emulate. This alone makes Christianity far superior to the perversion of Islam.
Threaded Mode
