Why I Am A Futurist

[Bowas]

Originally Posted by Sean

Bowas, the difference between us is I comment on the book, but leave the literal, obvious majority of it alone an untouched. I stick with the theme.

Case in point, I let the Tree of Life remain a literal tree, in fact, I believe it is the exact same tree as the one that was in the first paradise(Garden of Eden).

You guys turned the tree into human beings, using a concordance.

I simply think that "CROSSES THE LINE" into false doctrine interpretation.

Brother. None of this is about what we may "think" but what does the Bible in fact say.!?

Bro Blume gave you verses that shows prior references on what "tree" can refer to, yet you ignore it as it goes against what you want to believe and continue to speak against the Bible's usage of it.

And once again, whether it is or isn't, you are guessing about the "tree" with no scriptural reference, unlike Bro. Blume's presentations and No, Bro. Blume used the Bible not a concordance.

Did you ever respond to those verses?

Trust me. I do not know everything at all, but what I don't know, I look internally and try to see what it meant to them then, not what I was taught or what I may want it to mean or even what I think it may mean.