Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinker
I didn't defend the Stoneking accusations because I have heard those and have my own questions.
You didn't defend the Stoneking accusations because they are out and out lies and you cannot defend them. So you sidestepped them.
However Art Wilson went of wordshare submitted a explanation - and also posted photos to his Twitter that more then supports everything he has said -------to that I defend!!
He used that same photo in his anniversary video in November, 2014. I posted a captured screenshot from that video. 15 months is a long time to be using a borrowed photo. Unless you have something that predates this month he seemed to be content to continue using this misleading photo
Also it's clear that he used a photo from online to show the chapel OF THE FIRST SERVICE....
He captioned the photo as the first service. More than once.
It's also clear that HE POSTED A PHOTO IN AUGUST & SEPTEMBER OF HIS OWN SERVICES!! this is where you show your manipulation. Any NON-sceptic and non-critic and non hater. Would see that a few weeks after the online photo post he posted his own church service photos!! NO ONE WAS WATCHING AND THERE WAS NO ATTACK ON HIM -- he just posted the pictures of his service.
THAT FALLS RIGHT WITH HIS STORY THAT HE POSTED HIS OWN PHOTOS AS SOON AS HE GOT CLEARED.
So you start painting all this garbage as if he never had photos or he was deceiving.
I said one thing. I said he used a photo of something else and labeled that photo as his and did it for more than a year. What I said was true.
Art Wilson even posted on wordshare that he sees that it was unwise to use a online photo but it was not his intention to deceive just see his photos a few weeks latter.
When was this post on wordshare? Give us all time and date please.
So we have a guy who has spent all his resources to try handle a expensive ministry in Manhattan. And you tear that to nothing. I will take offense to you!! The man you painted had a opportunity to have lots of lime light if that's the kind person he was by speaking at the General Assembly but instead he gave his seat to another.
I think you are the phony here!!!
|
You can call me a phony and you can call me a liar but you haven't even scratched what I said. It still stands. He and his cadaver buddy are two of a kind, using fantastic and untrue claims in service of themselves and to highlight themselves.
He hasn't spent schtick to use a building that the Methodists provide to anyone who wants to use it for religious purposes and I guarantee you that neither of them would spend a cent on any religious ministry but their own, unlike those who provide them (and anyone else who wants to worship there) the facilities. I also guarantee you that neither of them has a single word to say about tolerance or peace or anything else that the UN invited them to talk about either.
Who's the phony. Huh? You see any other religious leaders, and there are many different religious practicing in that chapel, claiming to be "pastor of an international church"? LOL
Threaded Mode
