Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
WIi knew Stoneking did not lie. He knew Stoneking was relating a story from someone else and not saying he did it personally.
Stoneking did not know the story was a lie
WIi knew this and STILL called Stoneking a liar and a "slimy snake oil salesman."
|
Taking a break from researching just how many countries (wow so many) have permanent delegations to the UN.
The UN was pretty busy on the 21st. Just how busy involves audience screenshots.
I say he knows and knew that fantastic story wasnt true. Relating an untrue story from someone who relates an untrue story is called perpetuating a lie.
Which is also what I said. It wouldnt be perpetuated further on the internet if he had not used his self serving non annointed mouth to say it and put it out in the public arena.
With that said I only have to post the untrue story and the man telling it and the physical facts about the man and the marriages of that man to make my case. You say this is libel? Bleh.
It is not your place to post what this man did or did not know or his intent. It is his place. I already said he has not and will not correct this story. Proud, unrepentent men are not Godly men and men who in their message do and say such blatently untrue things are not annointed men. God directs men to say what is good and true.
Even the Quran has example: 'Say, Oh Mohammed, I am but a Messenger'....more than once. The bible directs men towards humility and so does the Quran.
Add proud, self-serving, and not annointed to the libel lawsuit. Say what you want about my intent. When someone shines a light on a man you uplift and hold high in esteem and you do not like what you see you better be asking yourself why and buying yourself a full length mirror.
Threaded Mode
