Quote:
Originally Posted by JoReba
Saul was called an apostle only by himself and by Luke, who had no authority to name anyone as an Apostle
|
So, right here you discredit 13 letters written by Paul, plus the Gospel account by Luke, and the book of Acts. If you are now scratching the top of your pointy head wondering why I mention the Gospel account of Luke since Paul isn't mentioned anywhere in it, It is only logical that if Luke got it wrong concerning the Apostle Paul he must of got it wrong in anything else he penned. Yet, I don't believe that, but you have to believe that and with that being said what portions of the New Testament do you believe are credible?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoReba
Saul was not called an apostle by any of the Twelve Apostles named by Jesus.
|
Called an apostle by one of the 12? Paul had Peter do way better than that. Peter calls the Paul's writings 'epistles" Scripture, and yes, you are sadly one of the unlearned, unstable who has wrested the scripture and is currently on his way to damnation.
2 Peter 3:15-16
And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation, even as our beloved Brother Paul also, according to the wisdom given unto him, hath written unto you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things. Therein are some things hard to understand, which those who are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Threaded Mode
