I explained it in those two posts I listed.
yes, and i explained that your explanation negates Christ's Word, and meaning
Nope. Not in my OP faith and circle. i already said it is the HEART many times.
i don't believe you, frankly. At the very least, it is a denial of what most any OP would accept as bona fides, would you not agree?
No. You are not answering what I am saying but answering what somebody else may have said or what you THINK I said.
so iow you don't wish to pursue the the statement 
If you are talking then address what I said, not a distortion of what I said. I already said several days ago what you came across for
Acts 2:38 is way offbase. I think you got a wrong understanding of it. You even said yourself
Acts 2:38 is fine unless it's taken out of its proper context. So anyone who mentions
Acts 2:38 is boxed in with the misunderstanding you evidently were presented. You forget there is a proper context to it. And you are convinced, with no evidence, I have the wrong context.
it is the evidence that leads me to the conviction. What i said about Acts 2:38 is widely accepted. That doesn't mean the verse is broken or anything, but that if it leads one to "i found it! And you must find it, too, or you are lost and going to hell!" then maybe it isn't working as planned anymore.
But you will not talk, so what can anyone do? You put words in my mouth and ignore what I actually said.
because it has led you to "they are all lost," which understanding i have left--i'm not interested. You are free to address the statement, or any of my unanswered questions. Shall i repost them?
Threaded Mode
