Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-30-2016, 11:05 PM
Evang.Benincasa's Avatar
Evang.Benincasa Evang.Benincasa is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood too


 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 41,044
Re: "Let Us Prey"-Hunter Lundy

Quote:
Originally Posted by good samaritan View Post
I am not suggesting newlyweds. What if a man has had a long marriage with out the fruit of the womb. To me your approach of interpretation also makes it necessary to have children to be in the ministry regardless.
My approach? Brother, what can I say, this is how the scripture reads. It admonishes those who would choose the eldership of bishop or deacon that the test of leadership be observed in their home. Husband of one wife? Children must give respect? I mean seriously, no hypothetical is even warranted here. This is as plain as Acts 2:38. This isn't my interpretation, this is plain old fashion wording. Husband one wife, means he has to be a faithful man, and be able to take care of situations in the home, and have his children (young) respectful. Thus saith Paul, not EB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by good samaritan View Post
Generally speaking I think Paul's command for the deacon's and bishop's criteria fits most of all. I still don't think that marriage is meant to be a proving ground, when he in other places recommends us to not marry.
Marriage isn't a proving ground? Then why even place it on the list to the Evangelist Timothy? Again, these aren't suggestions, because if they were then you could flip flop and modify the entire list according to your feelings?
1 Corinthians 7 isn't dealing with the criteria of minister as in 1st Timothy 3.
Again, if Paul is willy nilly throwing things out there, then we have no criteria in 1st Timothy 3 at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by good samaritan View Post
I certainly believe that people with marriage trouble should not be thinking about church government positions. I just don't see the common sense in disqualifying people from church offices because of choices to abstain from the flesh. I think Paul would think we could read between the lines in some areas. IMO
Reading between the lines is what makes a Mormon, and Moses Berg's Children of God. Paul wasn't writing for people to read between the lines. The Apostle Peter had some strong words about people reading between the lines of Paul's works 2 Peter 3:15-16 .

Here is the big indicator that Paul meant a married man, a faithful man, who ruled his house well as a litmus test.

1 Timothy 3:5

For if a man does not know how to manage his own family, how will he care for God’s church?
__________________
"all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."
~Declaration of Independence
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WANTED: "Hicky", "Blue Collared" Wannabes Jermyn Davidson Political Talk 16 09-21-2015 07:22 AM
**** Are the NCO and AWCF "raiding" the UPCI or providing a "safety net"? **** SDG The D.A.'s Office 373 02-06-2012 12:01 AM
While we move "ahead" Europe moves "backwards" Praxeas Political Talk 11 05-02-2010 02:36 PM
"Kill Him", "Treason", "Off With His Head!" Jermyn Davidson Political Talk 114 10-17-2008 10:17 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.