Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 09-11-2016, 12:29 AM
Esaias's Avatar
Esaias Esaias is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,945
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
How does this do away with divine empowerment?
No, I did not say it 'does away with divine empowerment'. I think we are using divine empowerment differently.

Quote:
Why do you think Paul taught us to come with the understanding that we are are alive to God after he taught that only happens after we die to sin first in 6:13.

Paul wanted to obey law and could not. He also said in Galatians 5 that only so long as we walk after the Spirit do we not fulfill lusts of the flesh. This is what I am saying.
I agree with that. I think we come to the same final conclusion, generally speaking, but through different methods, if that makes any sense?

Quote:
I see no difference between will power and wanting to do something or wishing it. In my use they're the same thing.
I see a distinction. But let's say there is no distinction, they are the same. That would mean that 'will power' is nothing more than merely wishing or desiring something, and does NOT include the actual choosing or doing of something, correct? So then you would be saying a person can wish all day long but nothing is going to happen until the cross does its work in their heart. Would be a fair representation?

Quote:
I will deal more thoroughly with your response later when I have the time. But I fail to see how your thoughts prove my proposition wrong.

To will is to desire. But desire is not enough. Then Paul said he served law of sin instead. He wanted to do good. Then he did evil instead. Note why would he follow up on willing to do good with saying he did evil instead? It's like I've personally experienced. Wanting to do good and the more I use natural energy to fulfill that, I do worse. I lived that stuff. He said he willed but instead sinned, indicating the attempt to do that good and failing.
The bolded part is where we disagree. What do you mean 'use natural energy'? A person can want all day long, but they will get nowhere until they actually do, that is, until they actually 'exercise their will'. By 'exercise their will' I do not mean 'strain to accomplish something' like trying to push a car that turns out to be too heavy for you. What I mean is 'actually choose' a course of action. People will not choose a course of action to obey God sincerely until and unless the Spirit of God motivates them. And the Spirit operates via the cross, for both the Spirit of God and the cross are said to be the 'power of God unto salvation'.

I do not understand Paul, in Romans 7, to be speaking about a regenerate person's experience. I believe he is speaking metaphorically (using himself as the 'example'), and is describing the experience of an unregenerate Jew. If a Christian is experiencing Romans 7, it is either because they are Christian in name only, or they have backslidden, or they are the victim of some seriously faulty teaching, or they have failed to 'do the word' even if they have 'heard the word' properly explained. Romans 7 is NOT the 'normal Christian life'.

The entire contrast in the whole epistle of Romans is the contrast between the unregenerate Jew and the regenerated Christian (whether Jew or Gentile). The Jew does not, in fact, obey God, in spite of having access to God's law and being zealous for God's commandments. The (regenerate) Gentile, however, does. The righteousness of the law is fulfilled not in those who are physically circumcised, but in those who are 'of faith', ie Christians, ie regenerated in the new covenant, ie born of the Spirit rather than of the flesh.

So when I look at Romans 7, I do not see a contrast being taught as between 'obeying God by the power of my own will and not succeeding vs obeying God by a supernatural infusion of power and being successful.' Rather, I see a contrast between 'having a mental agreement with God's law as being good and what I ought to do but nevertheless being overcome by my own fleshly desires for forbidden things vs actually choosing to do the will of God because the Spirit of God is leading me and I am following Him rather than my own flesh, made possible because Jesus died on the cross and His death has been applied to my heart.'

'There to my heart was the blood applied, Glory to His Name!'

Obeying God is not, to my mind, like trying to push a car, that is too heavy for my own muscles, so I need a superinfusion of angelic miracle strength to make the car move. Rather, it's more a case of 'do I choose self? Or God? Do I choose to gratify my own desires, or God's? I could do either one, but without the Spirit's gracious influences I will without fail choose my own desires. And with the Spirit's influence, brought to me by the cross, I will choose righteousness and holiness. If I fail to choose aright, it is because my heart has slid backwards from God. I might 'know' God's ways are best, but my HEART, ie my CHOICE, will have turned back from God and succumbed to my own desires.'

Every man when he is tempted is drawn away and enticed by his own desires. And desire when it conceives brings forth sin.

Question: How does lust 'conceive'? It takes two to tango, so there must be something that joins with desire to produce sin. That something is what I call 'will', ie the faculty of choosing, and the actual act of choosing (volition).
__________________
Visit the Apostolic House Church YouTube Channel!


Biblical Worship - free pdf http://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/21/biblicalworship4/

Conditional immortality proven - https://ia800502.us.archive.org/3/it...surrection.pdf

Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 09-12-2016, 08:19 AM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Thanks for your thoughts. I was unable to read them thoroughly due to time restrictions in the last few days. But I will later today.

I do agree maybe we're defining terms differently. This is an exaggeration, but this example shows how that can happen. If I see a colour and call it red and you are seeing the same colour and calling it crimson (or even if you're calling it blue), we are talking the same thing though using different words if in our hearts and minds it genuinely is the same idea.

Anyway, I just wanted to throw this in for consideration as well.

I see Romans 7 as speaking about a person unregenerated as well as regenerated. It covers both. The reason I say that is because he sued the same principle when speaking to regenerate Galatians in Gal 5. Walk after the Spirit and you won't fulfill lusts of the flesh. And what is the alternative? Walking after flesh. Romans 8:1 has a caveat for saying there is no condemnation to those in Christ condemnation. We cannot walk after the flesh. He would not say that if it was not possible for those in Christi to do this. After the last verse in ch 7 says use of the flesh to serve God causes us to swerve law of sin and death, verse 1 of 8 says to therefore do not walk after THAT FLESH, and there won't be condemnation.

Anyway, this is my main point for this morning, then I will read through all your thoughts more thoroughly.

Acts 15:9-11 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. (10) Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? (11) But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.


He was speaking not of a twisted version of law from the pharisees, but simple Old Covenant Law that included the very circumcision they debated about at this council in Jerusalem. No man can keep the law -- it's an unbearable yoke.

Again, let me stress, he's not talking about a twisted version any more than Gal 3 is not talking about a twisted version when it says all under the law are cursed.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 09-12-2016, 08:47 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Isn't the Law designed to back one into a corner wherein they have to accept the Gospel or be condemned?
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 09-12-2016, 10:06 AM
Esaias's Avatar
Esaias Esaias is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,945
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
Thanks for your thoughts. I was unable to read them thoroughly due to time restrictions in the last few days. But I will later today.

I do agree maybe we're defining terms differently. This is an exaggeration, but this example shows how that can happen. If I see a colour and call it red and you are seeing the same colour and calling it crimson (or even if you're calling it blue), we are talking the same thing though using different words if in our hearts and minds it genuinely is the same idea.

Anyway, I just wanted to throw this in for consideration as well.

I see Romans 7 as speaking about a person unregenerated as well as regenerated. It covers both. The reason I say that is because he sued the same principle when speaking to regenerate Galatians in Gal 5. Walk after the Spirit and you won't fulfill lusts of the flesh. And what is the alternative? Walking after flesh. Romans 8:1 has a caveat for saying there is no condemnation to those in Christ condemnation. We cannot walk after the flesh. He would not say that if it was not possible for those in Christi to do this. After the last verse in ch 7 says use of the flesh to serve God causes us to swerve law of sin and death, verse 1 of 8 says to therefore do not walk after THAT FLESH, and there won't be condemnation.
Well, I wasn't saying a Christian can't fall into a Romans 7 experience. I think all if us could attest to that happening at least once in our lives, more likely more than once. But I do not think it describes the "normal Christian life".


Quote:
Anyway, this is my main point for this morning, then I will read through all your thoughts more thoroughly.

Acts 15:9-11 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. (10) Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? (11) But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.


He was speaking not of a twisted version of law from the pharisees, but simple Old Covenant Law that included the very circumcision they debated about at this council in Jerusalem. No man can keep the law -- it's an unbearable yoke.

Again, let me stress, he's not talking about a twisted version any more than Gal 3 is not talking about a twisted version when it says all under the law are cursed.
Question: Why does Peter call it "tempting God" to do what Moses did? If the unbearable yoke is simply the old covenant, how is it tempting God to promote it when that is what God himself did for some 1500 years?

Maybe this is another case of definitions being mixed up?
__________________
Visit the Apostolic House Church YouTube Channel!


Biblical Worship - free pdf http://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/21/biblicalworship4/

Conditional immortality proven - https://ia800502.us.archive.org/3/it...surrection.pdf

Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 09-12-2016, 10:08 AM
Esaias's Avatar
Esaias Esaias is offline
Unvaxxed Pureblood


 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,945
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

And, as for "no man can keep the law", which commandments of God CANNOT be kept? Back in say Moses' day? I still haven't figured that out.
__________________
Visit the Apostolic House Church YouTube Channel!


Biblical Worship - free pdf http://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/21/biblicalworship4/

Conditional immortality proven - https://ia800502.us.archive.org/3/it...surrection.pdf

Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 09-12-2016, 03:00 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias View Post
Well, I wasn't saying a Christian can't fall into a Romans 7 experience. I think all if us could attest to that happening at least once in our lives, more likely more than once. But I do not think it describes the "normal Christian life".
Did you ever read that book entitled THE NORMAL CHRISTIAN LIFE, btw?

Quote:
Question: Why does Peter call it "tempting God" to do what Moses did? If the unbearable yoke is simply the old covenant, how is it tempting God to promote it when that is what God himself did for some 1500 years?

Maybe this is another case of definitions being mixed up?
First of all, we have to ask what it was that Peter said they and their forebears could not keep. I claim it's Mosaic law, and in that spirit I see Paul writing Romans 7.

But was tempting God meant the act of implying God made an error in giving Cornelius the Holy Ghost, by demanding their circumcision? IOW, to circumcise the Gentiles would be implying that God should not have given them the Spirit because the reception of the Spirit means they were cleansed by God and fit for His Spirit before any circumcision took place.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 09-12-2016, 03:03 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias View Post
And, as for "no man can keep the law", which commandments of God CANNOT be kept? Back in say Moses' day? I still haven't figured that out.
I already clarified that. It is CONSISTENT keeping that is the issue. We can do good ONLY SO LONG, but the moment we fail, we broke it all from the start. No one can CONSISTENTLY live a life of keeping law flawlessly, without breaking any of them ever. THAT is what I believe Peter meant by a yoke none can bear.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 09-12-2016, 03:03 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
Isn't the Law designed to back one into a corner wherein they have to accept the Gospel or be condemned?
I think so!

It's like the old saying goes.... law was a mirror showing all our flaws, and grace supplies the water, soap and facecloth.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 09-12-2016, 04:30 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Here's my more thorough response.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias View Post
I see a distinction. But let's say there is no distinction, they are the same. That would mean that 'will power' is nothing more than merely wishing or desiring something, and does NOT include the actual choosing or doing of something, correct? So then you would be saying a person can wish all day long but nothing is going to happen until the cross does its work in their heart. Would be a fair representation?
Ok, you're right. I should not have solely used the idea of will power. So, here is more accurately what I meant. Paul desired and willed to obey the law of God, but found he did not possess the power to fulfill that desire.

Romans 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

He willed and desired to do good. But he did not personally possess the ability to perform what he willed to do. Most think so long as there's a will there's a way, but Paul proved that to be error. He had the will but not the way. And the good he willed to do was the keeping of the law.

Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Paul said the problem is not with law. It's as holy as holy can be! But he, personally, was sold under sin. Being under law is somehow associated with being under the power of sin. But anyway, law was not the problem.

Romans 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

Above he says he did things he personally did not allow. We all did what we did not want to do but were unable to resist it. That's what Paul meant. He was distinguishing his will from his actual behaviour. He wanted his behaviour to do the good of the law. But he did not have the ability to perform the law. He just didn't.

Now, I know you asked several times what law can we not obey, as though anyone can obey any given law. So it seems that reasoning may be clouding your perception of what Paul is saying here. So, consider that Paul was not saying no one cannot keep any given law, but he is talking about over time maintaining such an obedience. That's why I said consistently keeping it, for we do good for a while, but then blow it, since sin inside us will rise up eventually and mar out consistent ability to keep law.

Romans 7:16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

So we are obviously meant to know by this last phrase above that the good he willed to do was obedience to law. And he distinguished his personal will and desire to fulfill it from his actual ability to carry it out. What he did was in contrast to what he wanted to do. And anything someone wants to do is what they ATTEMPT to do. In Paul's case his attempts failed. This implies he tried.

Romans 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

And since his will was to do the good of the law, and no matter how hard he tried to do it he failed, his analysis concluded that it was not him forcing himself to do wrong, as though one has to will to do wrong if one does wrong. he said he willed NOT to do wrong. And by the way he phrased all of this, we can only conclude Paul was saying sin was a force in him that made him do things other than his will desired to do. That force was irresistable. In this case, SIN is not a disobedient act as we normally understand sin. IT IS A FORCE. The force of SIN causes us to commit the disobedient acts of SINS. SIN was like an assassin, which is not an unlawful ACT. SIN can be defined two ways. Paul uses it in the singular in Romans 7 as A COMPELLING FORCE. Some call it the SIN NATURE. I'm not sure if that's the best term, but some do.

Romans 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

He substantiates his claim that it is not him that is the source of the urge to commit sins, but something distinct from him known as the force of sin by saying HE willed to do good, but did not find the ability within himself to actually carry that out. That is why I said law is an impossible system to keep.

Romans 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

When he used the phrase, "that I would", he meant he attempted to carry out his will to obey law. Good things he wanted to do were not done despite his efforts.

Romans 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

He puts the blame on the force of sin and not himself for doing sinful things, after having analyzed the fact he willed to obey law but found himself committing instead. If this is merely saying that he simply did not CHOOSE TO FULFILL godly desires and chose instead to commit sin, why would he say it was not him that did those acts, but the force of sin?

I think this can only mean that he actually tried to put into action what he willed to do, but found a force moving his hand that was stronger than his natural power to fulfill the law, and he committed sin instead. And I claim we've all experienced this. We know we must not get angry with someone, but though we fight that temptation to get angry, we get angry, anyway!

Romans 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

So Paul realized there was a SECOND LAW at work. In THIS case, the LAW he mentions in verse 21 is not the Law of Moses. It is a predicable pattern of cause and effect, much like the law of gravity. In this case, he said it happens everytime.... when HE WOULD DO GOOD --- using natural power to keep laws -- evil was there to ruin it all and compel him to instead do wrong. A force rose up and fought him.

That's what he said happened earlier in the chapter.

Romans 7:8-11 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead. (9) For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. (10) And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death. (11) For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

It's like saying, "They should have never told me to NOT DO THAT. I would have likely had not problem refraining from THAT, but as soon as they commanded me to NOT DO THAT something rose up inside me and I did it."

Romans 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

Then he explains what he already said, again. His will is to obey the law of God.

Romans 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

But he said ANOTHER LAW was at work. One law in MY MIND was great and wonderful. The Law of God. But ANOTHER LAW existed, which he referred to in verse 21. It activated the force of sin in him every time he willed to do good, until at some point, like a pressure cooker increasing its pressure until it finally blows, we cannot take it any more and we sin instead of maintain a sinless lifestyle.

Romans 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

It was so irresistable Paul figured he had to leave his body in death to be free of the miserable force he discovered was in that flesh. I disagree he was talking about an alleged criminal judgment by putting a dead body on the killer's back to let it rot away on top of him as an allegory Paul used. I think Paul literally called his flesh the body of death since it housed the force of sin that compelled him to violate law.

Quote:
The bolded part is where we disagree. What do you mean 'use natural energy'? A person can want all day long, but they will get nowhere until they actually do, that is, until they actually 'exercise their will'.
Right. Natural energy is all we have apart form the Spirit of God to carry out obedience to the will we desire to fulfill. It's like Israel trying to face giants and walls on their own, not leaning on the supernatural power of God to be with them and have them win.

So I claim exercising his will but failing anyway is what Paul meant in verses 18 and 21. He was brought into slavery... that is bondage against one's will. And that's more than wanting to do good BUT CHOOSING not to.

Quote:
By 'exercise their will' I do not mean 'strain to accomplish something' like trying to push a car that turns out to be too heavy for you. What I mean is 'actually choose' a course of action. People will not choose a course of action to obey God sincerely until and unless the Spirit of God motivates them.
Ok.

I believe that is not what Paul is talking about.

Quote:
And the Spirit operates via the cross, for both the Spirit of God and the cross are said to be the 'power of God unto salvation'.

I do not understand Paul, in Romans 7, to be speaking about a regenerate person's experience.
I believe it covers both. What I am proposing is that Paul teaches us that when we use natural energy alone to exercise our wills, sin is in our flesh and is too hard to resist, and we sin. Only by the power of the Spirit's help -- divine empowerment -- can sin as a force be overcome. And when Gal 5 said we won't fulfill the lusts of the flesh sol ling as we walk after the Spirit, I believe he is saying we can overcome only so long as we stop relying on natural power exercising our wills and instead leaning on God's Spirit for empowerment.

Quote:
I believe he is speaking metaphorically (using himself as the 'example'), and is describing the experience of an unregenerate Jew.
I agree IN PART.

Paul did struggle personally according to verse 9-10. Some scholars believe being alive without the law means pre-bar-mtzvah when a boy was not responsible for keeping law.

Quote:
If a Christian is experiencing Romans 7, it is either because they are Christian in name only, or they have backslidden, or they are the victim of some seriously faulty teaching, or they have failed to 'do the word' even if they have 'heard the word' properly explained. Romans 7 is NOT the 'normal Christian life'.
I disagree. I believe Romans 7 is any believer's experience -- MOST CHRISTIANS btw -- because they have never been taught to rely on the Spirit's strength other than for talking in tongues. lol

They cannot consistently live without committing sin.

So let's take it from here
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 09-16-2016, 06:20 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Law was an impossible system to keep

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume View Post
I think so!

It's like the old saying goes.... law was a mirror showing all our flaws, and grace supplies the water, soap and facecloth.
I like that. Good stuff.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Impossible! I'm of the body of Christ. newnature The Library 1 07-21-2013 04:22 PM
IMPOSSIBLE to Be JUST a man--HAD to be God Sheila Deep Waters 11 10-01-2012 09:00 AM
An Impossible Arguement. The Matt Fellowship Hall 38 02-12-2012 01:48 PM
Is The Right Trying to Make it Impossible... tstew Fellowship Hall 297 11-01-2010 05:31 PM
It is Impossible to have religious freedom in any areyourucky Fellowship Hall 0 10-30-2010 11:07 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.