Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
Meshach Shadrach and Abednego were wearing pants, Jesus in revelation has pants on under his garment. What service to God were the three Hebrew children conducting? They were being thrown in the fire.
Jesus is on a horse, and He is noted to have inscription on his thigh. Which isn't a tattoo. It was written on His garment. Meshach Shadrach and Abednego were wearing pants, they weren't priests. They are just men.
Quote:
|
Really? That is a stretch to say these wore pants.
|
Against robes on men? Bro, when did I say that? When did I post this?
Quote:
|
Poor choice of words on my part. Skirts, robes, dresses, kilts, whatever.
|
I actually pointed out that the men wore pants.
Quote:
|
No you did not prove men wore pants at all, you alluded to a couple verses in scripture that you think describe men wearing pants. The only verses in scripture that speak of men wearing breeches, is the ones where God specifically instructed the priest to wear breeches in service in the tabernacle. And he tells Moses why, "so their nakedness will not be exposed". This in itself should led one to understand that men did not wear any type of pants, or anything under their robes.
|
They wore robes, very long robes, but they also wore pants. Skirts? When people show me that they aren't use to using 17th Century Elizabethan English? I always encourage them to try other English translations. You will find the 17th Century usage for the word "skirt" is very different from your's.
|
While you want to define words properly, why don't you define the proper word for "Men" in
Deut. 22:5? It is "warrior". We can go back and forth on this all we want, but the fact is those that teach that the men's apparel in this passage is speaking specifically of pants, or split legged garments, or anything that pertains to a man. Need to be consistent and teach anything that looks like a man's garment cannot be worn by a women, and vise versa.
Threaded Mode
