Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny
Its obvious you can and will argue for anything without a shred of evidence. You have agreed the three Hebrew young men were wearing pants therefore you agree godly men wore pants. STILL WAITING for your Biblical evidence that godly women wore pants.
|
Beyond the three Hebrews in captivity there isn't any biblical "evidence" that anyone else wore pants, be they male or female. That's just factual data.
Now, you can take the three Hebrews and demand that their wearing pants somehow means that EVERY MALE wore pants and that NO FEMALES did... or you can agree with me. We don't know. For all either of us know, both males and females were wearing hosen under their tunics in the winter months, making their style of dress and use of bifurcated garments rather equal. Either way, we'd both be making a leap of logic and arguing from silence.
I'm not saying this to bash you. I'm just trying to be analytical.
Threaded Mode
