Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny
God's Word is not an issue for you? Makes sense due to your lack of Biblical evidence demonstrating that godly women wore pants.
|
Now you're being irrational. What you're telling me is that since men wore pantaloons as an undergarment, it is evidence that men wore pants. However, if I point out that women wore these pantaloons also, you refuse to see it as evidence that women wore pants too? LOL That's not a balanced interpretation.
And as I've asked before, why was this allowable under
Deuteronomy 22:5 if they interpreted it as you do???
If pantaloons worn by men under their interior garments is proof that men wore pants... then why aren't the pantaloons warn by women under their interior garments proof that women wore pants too?
Threaded Mode
