More on Skirts

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pliny

I asked if you believe pedophilia is a sin. Apparently, you cannot answer this simple question since you answered it with your

No, it's that your question is stupid and doesn't deserve an answer.

Originally Posted by Pliny

Then, I said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny View Post
Apparently you seem to believe that the Bible must specifically state that women should not wear pants.

Now, you say you do not need specificity. At least now there is some progress. You argue that absence is not proof. This is understandable because you have provided NO Biblical evidence for godly women wearing pants. The Bible also demonstrates that godly men wore pants and godly women did not.

No, it does not. We can do this all day. You can claim it all day, but you have no actual proof.

Originally Posted by Pliny

Yes, I know that godly Jewish men wore pants and godly Jewish women did not. How do I know this? Not because I am thousands of years old but because I use the BIBLE. Apparently, you do not think the Bible is a worthy consideration; thus, you use the Talmud instead. How Pharisaical of you. You think the Talmud trumps the Bible. Good to know.

Post my quote where I state the Talmud trumps the Bible. Contrary to your repeated claims, the Bible does not state that women only wore robes and that men wore pants.

Originally Posted by Pliny

BTW, You did not adequately indicate you were copying and pasting from the Talmud. Some could charge you with plagiarism. This is because it can appear that you are quoting something without proper citation. Proper citations are important because it gives the reader an opportunity to review the quoted material in the context that it was written in.

I forgot, you don't understand basic sentence structure or the use of quotation marks. You want to "charge" me with plagiarism, be my guest.

Originally Posted by Pliny

The Talmud does NOT invalidate the Bible. The Bible invalidates the Talmud whenever they diverge. Please try again. This time, you might consider using the Bible.

Post my quote where I stated the Talmud invalidates the Bible. You were whining about my posting a quote (using quotation marks) and threatening to "charge" me with plagiarism, yet you post a completely false accusation above.

Originally Posted by Pliny

But then again, you are stuck on the idea that the "hosen" they wore must have been water hosen.

Another false statement. You could be "charged" with lying.

Originally Posted by Pliny

That's okay. Whenever the facts don't agree with you just ignore them. It may help you sleep at night.

No, that's you switching between Strongs and Dictionary.com whichever one helps your narrative. It's you ignoring history and culture and using silence in the Bible to try and prove that "well if it's not in there, it must not have happened."

I sleep very well at night, thank you.