Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 06-27-2018, 08:14 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Did Jesus Wear Pants?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa View Post
The pants worn during the time of Christ, and before that in the near and Middle East. Were worn by soldiers, calvary, and even infantry. Trousers weren’t worn by the women. Parthian horseman wore trousers, Celtic warriors wore trousers which were adopted by the Romans.
We shouldn't take our queues from culture. I believe there are biblical principles that can be applied in any given cultural context. We should stick to Scripture. Pants on women are not specifically condemned in Scripture. In fact, I remember reading how trousers were worn by women under their outer garments in colder regions during colder seasons. Everyday attire worn by both men and women were actually similar in ancient Israel.

But it doesn't matter. For even if they went to the extreme to condemn pants on women, even trousers under the outer garments during colder seasons, it matters little. Because the Jews were known for taking the Scriptures to an extreme beyond what they actually taught.

I still contend that the text speaks of the individual wearing that which pertains to the opposite gender as being an "abomination". This phrase is commonly used in reference to both idolatry and sexual perversions. Therefore, I contend that the text is addressing an idolatrous perversion that was common among the heathen, and is common even today among the "Drag Queen", cross dressing, gender bending, subculture. Who would deny that the perversion of cross dressing and gender bending is an "abomination" on par with homosexuality itself? In fact, one finds the cross dressing community littered with homosexuals and deviants practicing all manner of perversions.

This isn't a shallow condemnation of trousers, pants, pajamas, uniform pants, crotch-knit safety chaps/trousers, or Levi's on women. The rule isn't about a "style". This is the moral condemnation of a perversion, a confusion, a denial of gender that plays to sexual deviancy and perversion. It's far deeper and more serious a matter than Jordache jeans.

Last edited by Aquila; 06-27-2018 at 08:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ensey Strikes : Women who wear pants may go bi? DAII The D.A.'s Office 117 01-21-2011 09:13 PM
Woman who wouldn't wear pants wins settlement TRFrance The Tab 8 02-12-2009 11:18 AM
Wet pants. Scott Hutchinson Fellowship Hall 2 11-13-2008 07:17 PM
You should never wear a tie LordChocolate Fellowship Hall 34 12-29-2007 11:30 AM
Did Jesus wear Velvet and Did Elvis really love Jesus? Papabear Fellowship Hall 3 08-12-2007 08:19 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.