Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron
Yes, from what these guys said, SCOTUS have the four States in mentioned in Texas's lawsuit that they have till tomorrow evening to respond to the lawsuit.
These guys mentioned that the most likely scenario is to says that the Election was not done in these four States according to the Constitution, therefore SCOTUS throws it back in the State legislatures hands to select the electors, or to defer to Congress. If it goes to Congress than it goes by each State having one vote. Trump leads Biden in that regard.
I just wish some people involved would see jail time. This is ridiculous.
|
When a case was brought BEFORE the election about the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overstepping it bounds by demanding a 3-day extension on absentee ballots, the vote was 4-4 to hear the case. Alito said then that the wording of the Constitution on the authority retained by the State Legislators regarding electors was "unambiguous." Had ACB been able to participate in the hearing, the vote would have been 5-4. It is my understanding that the dissenters said the suit could only be brought AFTER the election. So why would they refuse to hear now?
Threaded Mode
