SCOTUS Denies Final Trump Lawsuit - It's Over

[Ron]

Originally Posted by Originalist

When a case was brought BEFORE the election about the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overstepping it bounds by demanding a 3-day extension on absentee ballots, the vote was 4-4 to hear the case. Alito said then that the wording of the Constitution on the authority retained by the State Legislators regarding electors was "unambiguous." Had ACB been able to participate in the hearing, the vote would have been 5-4. It is my understanding that the dissenters said the suit could only be brought AFTER the election. So why would they refuse to hear now?

From my limited understanding, and I am getting this from the video I posted. When there is a dispute between States, be it water rights, boundaries, or Federal Elections. The only avenue of relief is SCOTUS. SCOTUS has ko alternative but to hear it. The case is on the docket and they are going to hear it. I think that is why the State of Texas did what they did. SCOTUS must look at the case now.