Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
You claimed, without any proof or accusation from Pulitzer or anyone else, that simply because a machine was connected to WiFi and there was data being sent/received that there was fraud happening.
I'm saying that just because it was connected to the WiFi and data was being sent/received does not mean fraud was occurring.
What part of that do you not understand? You made a baseless accusation that is not correct. Now you want to ignore that.
|
When Pulitzer says - NO WIFI - his testimony indicates he expects fraud is occurring. That is probably why the Senate Hearing voted to investigate.
Quote:
I know that GA Rule 183-1-12-.05.2 states: "Electronic ballot markers, ballot scanners, and election management systems shall not be connected to the internet and no other software shall be loaded onto or maintained or used on computers on which the election management system software is located except as specifically authorized by the Secretary of State."
(There is nothing in 183-1 anywhere I've read detailing the penalty for doing so)
It's impossible to have a conversation with you. Go ahead and post as much unverified and misleading information as you wish.
I'm done.
|
When the rule says ONLY the SOS can “specifically authorize”, that indicates you might be facing a “penalty” if you violate that rule.
Did you fall on yo head, Fred?
Threaded Mode
