I don't consider CS a freaky con... not yet that is..(lol) Why he would state something that evidence suggests otherwise.
My last question is not really a rhetorical question. Evidence shows there is a lot of history that is supressed. I may not agree w/ TF and his views, but there is no doubt there is an element of the upci that many would attempt to sweep under the rug. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I understand the victors have a right to write history in their favor. One cannot deny historical revisionism has taken place w/ the history of upci.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
That supposed lack of substance has now garnered almost 700 posts!
As to your last question, neither is preferable. Your question must be rhetorical.
Coonskinner stated his opinion. That's all. And so far we've had many more
"easy believism" posters on this thread that freaky-conservatives.
|
Threaded Mode
