|
Tab Menu 1
| The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF. |
 |
|

02-25-2007, 10:17 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
As I am wiped out, and my brain is fried after the events of the day, I will only attempt to explain John 3:5. I will specifically address numbers one and two on your list.
1. John 3 is what it is. A Pre-resurrection outline of cross-dispensational Truth. Even Matthew Henry recognized the import of Christ's words to Nicodemus.
I believe the current mainline Apostolic understanding of the New Birth is correct, in that it teaches a singular regeneration resulting from the dual action of the ordinance of baptism, and the work of the Spirit, in a newly repentant believer's life.
|
Excellent post, Brother.
|

02-25-2007, 10:26 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel:
2. What does being born again really mean?
|
The new birth is a creative life-giving operation of the Holy Spirit upon a lost human soul, whereby in response to faith in Christ crucified ( John 3:14-16; Gal 3:24), the believing one, "dead in trespasses and sins" ( Eph 2:1), is quickened into spiritual life and made a partaker of the divine nature and of the life of Christ Himself ( Gal 2:20; Eph 2:10; Col 1:27; 1 Peter 1:23-25; 2 Peter 1:4). The complete necessity of this spiritual transaction is the result of fallen man's state of spiritual death, his alienation from God, and his consequent utter inability to "see" ( John 3:3) or "to enter into" the kingdom of God (3:5). No matter how moral, refined, talented, or religious the natural or unregenerate man may be, he is blind to spiritual truth and unable to save himself (3:6; cf. Ps 51:5; 1 Cor 2:14; Rom 8:7-8). It is clear, therefore, that the new birth is not the reformation of the old nature but the reception of a new nature.
|

02-25-2007, 10:27 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Excellent post, Brother.
|
Thanks friend.
|

02-25-2007, 10:31 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
The New Birth is foreshadowed in the first two or three verses of Genesis 1.
|

02-25-2007, 10:32 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Thanks friend. 
|
Please post the whole commentary, PP.... and how do you equate import with ...I t is probable that Christ had an eye to the ordinance of baptism
Lastly ... CS why the high fives??? .....All he did was restate what we already know is the PAJC view.
That's like high-fiving your teamates when your team is losing in a blowout.
|

02-25-2007, 10:33 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
The New Birth is foreshadowed in the first two or three verses of Genesis 1.
|
Absolutely.
1. God filling a void.
2. God creating something from nothing.
3. God creating order from chaos.
4. God brooding (spiritual movement) over water.
|

02-25-2007, 10:33 PM
|
|
Non-Resident Redneck
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
Please post the whole commentary, PP.... and how do you equate import with ...I t is probable that Christ had an eye to the ordinance of baptism
Lastly ... CS why the high fives??? .....All he did was restate what we already know is the PAJC view.
That's like high-fiving your teamates when your team is losing in a blowout.
|
Losing?
Copying and pasting Gillespie doth not a victory make.
|

02-25-2007, 10:36 PM
|
|
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
Losing?
Copying and pasting Gillespie doth not a victory make.
|
Whatevah ... as for your oldtime PCIers and PAJCers were New Birth twins comments ... do you recant????
|

02-25-2007, 10:36 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
Please post the whole commentary, PP.... and how do you equate import with ...I t is probable that Christ had an eye to the ordinance of baptism
Lastly ... CS why the high fives??? .....All he did was restate what we already know is the PAJC view.
That's like high-fiving your teamates when your team is losing in a blowout.
|
I don't get it. ???
My only point was that even a non-Apostolic, such as MH sees the "probability" that being "born of the water" assumes baptism. I would go further than "probable", I would say it is exactly what Jesus meant.
Look Guy, you asked for commentary here. I was only obliging.
|

02-25-2007, 10:37 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
The new birth is a creative life-giving operation of the Holy Spirit upon a lost human soul, whereby in response to faith in Christ crucified ( John 3:14-16; Gal 3:24), the believing one, "dead in trespasses and sins" ( Eph 2:1), is quickened into spiritual life and made a partaker of the divine nature and of the life of Christ Himself ( Gal 2:20; Eph 2:10; Col 1:27; 1 Peter 1:23-25; 2 Peter 1:4). The complete necessity of this spiritual transaction is the result of fallen man's state of spiritual death, his alienation from God, and his consequent utter inability to "see" ( John 3:3) or "to enter into" the kingdom of God (3:5). No matter how moral, refined, talented, or religious the natural or unregenerate man may be, he is blind to spiritual truth and unable to save himself (3:6; cf. Ps 51:5; 1 Cor 2:14; Rom 8:7-8). It is clear, therefore, that the new birth is not the reformation of the old nature but the reception of a new nature.
|
Good.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.
| |