|
I would like to make a few observations here. Disregarding whether or not the writer Langston made some venemous remarks... why couldn't he have simply held his beliefs, did what he was going to do to build a church, then in retrospect say "Hey, here is the approach we took, and here is the results we got!" The proof is in the puddin' so-to-speak! There are several things he stated that in my opnion are accurate, right on, but he comes accross as confrontational to those who hold "traditional" values. If he wouldn't have had this confrontational approach, I think his "thesis" would have been better received and considered by those who have entertained many of the thoughts he suggests but are apprehensive about diverging from the "traditions" they have received.
__________________
...or something like that... 
|
Threaded Mode
