Quote:
Originally Posted by Believer
The question was written in the simplest way possible.
Here is the question again.. pay close attention to what I asked:
|
And I repeat, please pay attention, the question is flawed because it assumes something that is NOT true.
Quote:
|
Please noticed that I worded it....according to the Oneness doctrine Jesus is the Father.
|
No, you said according to the Oneness doctrine jesus is Father and the opposte or the converse question is but is the Father the Son. That question leads to the conclusion that what you mean by "jesus is the Father" is "The Son is the Father". Thus you question is a logical fallacy. When OPs say "Jesus is the Father" they are NOT saying "The Son is the Father"
Quote:
|
Jesus is the Son of God. Do you agree or disagree?
|
Are you just trying to to see the point? When OPs say Jesus is the Father they are NOT saying "Jesus is God"...may I ask...is Jesus God? Is the Son God? Yes in OP theology Jesus is the Son, but also Jesus is the Father. HOW is Jesus both? Because when OPs are saying that they are speaking of the Person of Jesus who has those two distinct roles or modes
Quote:
|
If Jesus is the Son, and you also claim that He is the Father, then is the Father the Son? Very simple and straight forward question.
|
Ok, well God has revealed Himself as Father and as Son....does that make Father the Son? Trinitarians have said Father is Yahweh and Son is Yahweh...does that make Father the Son? and you complain about what Oneness do with Trinitarian doctrine. This is why we only argue.