Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
Back in the late 1980's (remember the "87 Reasons", then the "88 Reasons" ...?) I went around asking many of our brethren about this very passage. Dallas Theological Seminary's Dwight Pentecost's book " Things to Come" was a standard text book on eschatology and he discusses this apparent "flip-flop" of interpretation.
Nobody I asked even wanted to discuss it. They were all afraid of being either being wrong or being quoted. There's some real disconnects when it comes to some of our pet doctrines and the Bible. John 3:5 is another example. Acts 2:15 is a doozy. |
Well, if we are truely Apostolics as we claim to be, we MUST follow the scriptures wherever they lead us, even to unpopular conclusions. The trinity comes to mind and Jesus name baptism.
An Apostolic is one that teaches ONLY what the Apostles believed and taught, as Jesus instructed them.
If God opens my understanding in my search for more truth, then I, as an Apostolic will follow Him.
Threaded Mode
