|
It is very interesting to me that every thread that addresses doctrinal absolutes or the erosion of them, is swiftly swept into a "standards" debate. As Steadfast has stated, there are variations to separation taught in each church whether liberal or conservative. (and yes both libs and cons teach some level of separation)
The issue here has little to do with standards, but has everything to do with doctrine. The doctrine of the trinity is a false doctrine! Since this false doctrine is the foundation of their belief it leaves all subsequent doctrines in question i.e. baptism, eternal security, etc. The PAW is facing a critical doctrinal erosion.
The only parallel to the UPCI's passing of res 4 IMHO is that the men who passed res 4 kept bringing it back until it passed, and the men who brought this res to the PAW will keep bringing it back until it passes as well.
|
Threaded Mode
