Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:29 AM
Truthseeker's Avatar
Truthseeker Truthseeker is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
True Noah went THROUGH the flood however Enoch left before the flood.


Matt 24:37

37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
KJV


Jesus compared his coming to days of Noah not Enoch.
__________________
Today pull up the little weeds,
The sinful thoughts subdue,
Or they will take the reins themselves
And someday master you. --Anon.


The most deadly sins do not leap upon us, they creep up on us.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:54 AM
Timmy's Avatar
Timmy Timmy is offline
Don't ask.


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 24,212
Ever notice that Methuselah, Noah's grandpa and Enoch's son, died the same year as the flood? Does that mean he was one of the wicked folks who died in the flood?

(Meth was 187 when his son Lamech was born. Lamech was 182 when his son Noah was born. Meth lived to age 969, or 600 years after Noah's birth, which is the year the flood started.)
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty

More New Stuff in Timmy Talk!
My Countdown Counting down to: Rapture. Again.
Why am I not surprised?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:15 AM
Falla39's Avatar
Falla39 Falla39 is offline
Wouldn't Take Nothin' For My Journey Now!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,358
Are You Sure You Don't Want To Be Left Behind?

God never leaves Himself without witness. If one goes down, He raises up

another. You don't hear much about the book of Enoch. He chose the

foolish things of this world to confound the wise. (those who are wise in

man's thinking.) How much do you hear about Lazarus after Jesus raised

him from the dead. Jesus didn't always allow men to know who He truly

was when he had reason to not want them to know!! But God is not going

to leave Himself without witness. He has true witnesses today. We just may

not know who and where they are. Could be one or many! And if those

witnesses ever get lifted up in pride and forget whose witnesses they are,

and give HIM ALL the GLORY, they will be coming down off their high horse

just as Saul of Tarsus did. He was taken down as Saul but resurrected as

Paul. He had been dead in trespasses and sins but God "killed" his pride and

arrogance and raised him up and gave him a new "identity"! He'll do the same

for us if we will let (allow, permit) Him to!!

I'm so glad Jesus lifted me, I'm so glad Jesus lifted me
I'm so glad Jesus lifted me, Glory, Hallelujah, Jesus lifted me.

When I was in prison, Jesus set me free....
When I was downhearted, Jesus lifted me...
When I was a sinner, Jesus lifted me...

Blessings,

Falla39
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-28-2007, 11:42 AM
pelathais's Avatar
pelathais pelathais is offline
Accepts all friends requests


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Thanks Raven for dispelling another myth ... I feel stupid.

Pela what's the deal w/ Acts 2:15???
Quote:
Originally Posted by redeemedcynic84 View Post
I think the issue is that he didn't say they weren't drunk because they didn't drink ever...

he said they weren't drunk because it was too early in the morning for them to be drunk...
I saw these posts only just now- after the thread had been bumped and kicked around for a while. Sorry for the lateness of my reply...

Act 2:15 For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day.

We tend to add an inflection to our voice when we quote the clause "as ye suppose..." Many Apostolic preachers will then add something like, "Peter didn't say they weren't drunk, he just said they weren't drunk as ye suppose...!!!"

And then exhortations are given for people to behave in a drunken fashion, to "get drunk" on the "new wine," etc.

Peter's statement is that the disciples, who were speaking in other languages as they praised God, were not drunk at all. He goes on to point out that it's in the morning so the charge of drunkenness is not likely to be valid. Further, we are not told that the disciples were engaging in "drunken behavior" of any kind. They were praising God in languages that they had never learned.

We tend to take little inferences and bits and pieces of scripture to endorse, even to encourage amd promote behavior that is not really explicitly described in the Bible. And then we condemn anyone who does not perform a baptism with the literal exactness that we require of Acts 2:38.

Consistancy would appear to demand that we re-examine our traditions and seek to conform our behavior more closely with the scripture. Of discussing these things publically or even privately is verbotem. Approach an evangelist who has just preached a sermon about "Joel's Bar" and try to get them to elucidate.

I was very naive when I was younger and thought I was missing something so I tried to do just that on several occasions. Instead of trying to persude me or even to reassure me, people would immediately launch into a defensive tirade.

Raven's post about "those left behind" is another example. I got blistered by my pastor for even trying to bring it up with him privately. It seems most of us know that many of our traditions are rather weakly established on a foundation of the scriptures. Why can't we talk about this and try to align ourselves more closely with the Word of God?
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-28-2007, 11:47 AM
pelathais's Avatar
pelathais pelathais is offline
Accepts all friends requests


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
True Noah went THROUGH the flood however Enoch left before the flood.
But the Lord does not exhort us to be like Enoch in this passage, instead we are told to be aware of the conditions in Noah's day.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:06 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,749
Pelathais,

I'm still not sure what point you are making regarding Acts 2:15. Those filled with the Holy Ghost must have been acting somewhat strangely for onlookers to say "These men are full of new wine." And Peter set them straight and told them that they had not been drinking wine/alcohol.

If someone wants to say they were drunk in the Spirit, what is wrong with that?

Eph 5:18 And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit;

1 Cor 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
__________________
His banner over me is LOVE.... My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?

To be a servant of God, it will cost us our total commitment to God, and God alone. His burden must be our burden... Sis Alvear
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:37 PM
Falla39's Avatar
Falla39 Falla39 is offline
Wouldn't Take Nothin' For My Journey Now!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,358
Are You Sure You Don't Want To Be Left Behind?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais View Post
I saw these posts only just now- after the thread had been bumped and kicked around for a while. Sorry for the lateness of my reply...

Act 2:15 For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day.

We tend to add an inflection to our voice when we quote the clause "as ye suppose..." Many Apostolic preachers will then add something like, "Peter didn't say they weren't drunk, he just said they weren't drunk as ye suppose...!!!"

And then exhortations are given for people to behave in a drunken fashion, to "get drunk" on the "new wine," etc.

Peter's statement is that the disciples, who were speaking in other languages as they praised God, were not drunk at all. He goes on to point out that it's in the morning so the charge of drunkenness is not likely to be valid. Further, we are not told that the disciples were engaging in "drunken behavior" of any kind. They were praising God in languages that they had never learned.

We tend to take little inferences and bits and pieces of scripture to endorse, even to encourage amd promote behavior that is not really explicitly described in the Bible. And then we condemn anyone who does not perform a baptism with the literal exactness that we require of Acts 2:38.

Consistancy would appear to demand that we re-examine our traditions and seek to conform our behavior more closely with the scripture. Of discussing these things publically is verbotem. Approach an evangelist who has just preached a sermon about "Joel's Bar" and try to get them to elucidate.

I was very naive when I was younger and thought I was missing something so I tried to do just that on several occasions. Instead of trying to persude me or even to reassure me, people would immediately launch into a defensive tirade.

Raven's post about "those left behind" is another example. I got blistered by my pastor for even trying to bring it up with him privately. It seems most of us know that many of our traditions are rather weakly established on a foundation of the scriptures. Why can't we talk about this and try to align ourselves more closely with the Word of God?


Bro. Pelathais,

I remember hearing about when my Methodist grandmother (who read

and studied the Bible in the Methodist church and even shouted her long

hair down there. My dad witnessed it and related to to us later.) God will

not leave Himself without witness! Later when a white haired man of God

came to their town, preaching the message of Pentecost, they went out

of curiousity. The message that man preached was different from any that

Grandma had heard in the Methodist church. She had been a member for

21 yrs, her mother, a charter member for 48 yrs. and Grandma had not

ever heard such a message. She decided right there she would go home

look into the Word and prove him wrong. She found that she only could

prove him right. Later my dad, who was 14 at the time asked her if it

didn't sound like some more of the JW doctrine. She quickly replied, "No,

Son, I've searched the scriptures and it's there. She was first of her family

to obey the message of the apostles.

Bro. Pelathais, Grandma's family thought she had lost it after she obeyed

the gosple and left the Methodist church. They did not want her to remain

there, like some do today. But her family, one by one, came and embraced

the same message after a while. That has been five generations ago.

If you are pointing out something to someone and they are standing there

and keep saying, "I can't see it" when it is right before their eyes, it is

evident they either do not want to see it or perhaps they could be fearful

of what they would see and be accountable for. Like one of my sisters in

law many years ago. She would get fearful about some things happening

in their lives and would call me and want me to come over and talk to her.

One night when she called and I went, the subject came up about baptism

in Jesus Name. She said she had never heard that. I showed her in the

Bible where it said to repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the

name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins.....". Later after she obeyed

the apostolic message, she would testify and tell about when I had showed

her the scripture. She said she asked God to forgive her later, but she said

she was SO miserable she said sometimes I wish she hadn't told me. She

couldn't get away from it. She said she asked God to forgive her for her

ignorance (she just didn't know it.) To be ignorant as in not ever knowing

and to be willingly ignorant, are not the same. Knowing but not willing to do

what you need to do is dangerous. For he that knoweth to do good and

doeth it not, to him it is sin.

Brother, sometimes instead of just admitting you don't know anything

or much about prophesy or anything, I think that's when you will be as

you spoke, "blistered". If parents do not want their young children to do

something and they disobey, they get a blistering sometimes. That's not

the same. Children are just that. They are not mature and they are not

adults. But ADULTS will resent being treated as children. However it seems

that in order to maintain control over ADULTS, there are certain tactics

used to do so. Whether it be fear or whatever. There were those in Jesus

day who feared being put out of the synagogue. The disciples feared the

jews. The religious of that day used the Law because that was what they

were under. But after the death, burial and resurrection of our Lord, and

after His glorification and ascension, He left to pour out the Spirit from on

high, and set those captives free. Peter was so afraid of being identified

with Jesus, He denied Him three times in a short period of time. But look

at fearless Peter, with John, a few days later at the Gate Beautiful, preach-

ing the name of Jesus. They came and beat (blistered) them and told them

not to preach in that name anymore. They now were not fearful of man

but had godly fear. Should we obey men or God? The fear of God is to

begin to have wisdom, and knowledge and understanding. The fear of man

brings a snare (trap). He wants to set us all free ... from the law of sin

and death. We must be willing and obedient (to God) and we shall eat the

good of the land.

Blessings,

Falla39
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:20 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas View Post
Mat 24:37 As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.
Mat 24:38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark,
Mat 24:39 and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.
Mat 24:40 Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken and one left.
Mat 24:41 Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one left.
Mat 24:42 Therefore, stay awake, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming.

Let's look again at the flood and what really happened folks. Noah and his family were lifted UP above the flood while the rest of humanity was swept away by the flood.

Christ did not concentrate on who was LIFTED UP ...and remained in the world, by the way. He concentrated upon who was TAKEN in DESTRUCTION in Noah's day in order to relate to us who would be TAKEN IN DESTRUCTION when he comes.

The thief in the night aspect mentioned later in Matt 24 also concentrates on the destruction arriving, and not what is removed from destruction. Everything about Matt 24 is destruction alone, and who is left alive and well.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:29 PM
dizzyde's Avatar
dizzyde dizzyde is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by COOPER View Post
But what about being changed in a moment? You know...the dead in Christ will rise first and we that are alive will be caught up in the clouds.
I have read this thread with much interest, this is a topic that I have wondered about but not actually spent much time studying. (as it isn't salvational, I will excuse myself for my ignorance, lol) I am not convinced either way, just curious. I hadn't seen anyone respond to the post above, and was wondering where it would fall in this line of reasoning.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:31 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by dizzyde View Post
Quote:
But what about being changed in a moment? You know...the dead in Christ will rise first and we that are alive will be caught up in the clouds.
I have read this thread with much interest, this is a topic that I have wondered about but not actually spent much time studying. (as it isn't salvational, I will excuse myself for my ignorance, lol) I am not convinced either way, just curious. I hadn't seen anyone respond to the post above, and was wondering where it would fall in this line of reasoning.

When we read words that actually deal with the rapture, the dead being raised and the living saints raised after, there is no mention of SINNERS.

Jesus contrasted sinners from saints in the account of who was taken in Noah's day. Nothing about the rapture is mentioned in Noah's account by Jesus. People have incorrectly assumed He did, and this is the point of this thread, I believe.

My thoughts, anwyay.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who Is To The Left and Right Of Me??? Brother Strange Fellowship Hall 32 07-25-2007 09:01 PM
I have Left the UPC Church Michlow Fellowship Hall 614 06-25-2007 09:15 AM
Woa Nelly-Police Just Left Ron Fellowship Hall 13 03-11-2007 08:23 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.