Quote:
Originally Posted by TRFrance
Granted, you may have had great fellowship with both.
My point is though, on the issue of salvation, you are closer to them than us.
If a sinner were to walk in off the street, "accept Jesus", and say the sinners prayer, the Bapticostal and a PCI person will both agree that the man is saved at that moment. The "3 stepper" is the one who'd would say the man is not saved if he didnt get baptized and filled yet. If a dispute were to arise over the issue , the Bapiticostal and PCI believer would naturally be on the same side of the argument.
One need only read thru a few threads on this site to see that many of the PCI folk here are more in agreement with Baptists on the salvation issue, than they are with PAJC/Oneness believers. In fact, they seem to spew more of their antagonism toward us, than toward the multitude of false-doctrine churches out there that don't have truth... (which is ridiculous in itself). Lord help us.
|
Bro. France ....
Many PAJCers believe that a person baptized in the titles can/will be saved. And many, when the rubber meets the road, also believe that tongues aren't crucial to salvation.
I believe I'm closer to and have more in common with the typical PAJCer than to the typical Baptist when it comes to soteriology.
Threaded Mode
