Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28  
Old 03-03-2008, 07:11 AM
Digging4Truth's Avatar
Digging4Truth Digging4Truth is offline
Still Figuring It Out.


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,858
Re: Please Explain the Existence of Dinasour Fossi

Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais View Post
Moses wrote the Law, the "Pentateuch" was the work of others who supplied addition historical material and devotional commentary. If you actually read the Pentateuch without the traditional mindset you will see that there is no reason to think that Moses wrote that material.

Read Deuteronomy 34:5-6 which tells us of the death and burial of Moses. Are we to respond by saying "Amen" to the notion that Moses wrote the account of his own death and burial? And what about the statement "unto this day...?" Nobody knows the burial place of Moses all the way up until the day he died and was buried? Tradition makes the Bible say nonsense.

Getting back to Genesis, the writer here appears to be the same writer who wrote of Moses' death. See Gen 26:33; Gen. 32:32; Gen. 35:20; Gen. 47:26.

Then turn to and read that last short chapter of Deuteronomy again (Deut. 34) but don't stop reading! Quickly turn the page and begin Joshua 1. Notice the continuity? The fact that Joshua and Deuteronomy were written by the same hand (and that hand could not have been Moses) is not something that the Bible is trying to hide.

And don't stop with Joshua. Joshua 24:29-33 closes out that book, and without even pausing for a breath Judges 1:1 opens up. And so it goes all the way through to the end of 2 Kings. The hand that wrote Genesis also had a hand in writing 2 Kings and that could not have been Moses.

Back to Genesis again, check out Genesis 14:14 - "he pursued them unto Dan." But wait a minute; Abraham was Dan's great-grandfather and Dan had not even been born yet. For that matter, Abraham was Abram in chapter 14 and had not children at all yet. How could Abraham have pursued his enemy all the way to a city named after his unborn great-grandson?

Well, Moses wrote it, right? Moses knew that Dan would eventually be born. Moses in fact lived over 400 years later. But that's where the real problem comes up. Moses died before the children of Israel moved into the Promised Land. Moreover, the tribe of Dan was given its inheritance in southern Israel near Reuben (Joshua 19:40-48). The southern coastal area was given to Dan by lot. Then notice Joshua 19:47. These are events that are described in detail in Judges 18.

So Abram pursued his enemies to a city named after his great-grandson and this is written by Moses even though that city never was known as "Dan" until more than 100 years after the death and burial of Moses- which Moses also wrote about?

The Bible itself almost screams for us to lay down our traditions and to actually pay attention to its message.
VERY thought provoking.

I have not read all of the posts I have missed over the last few days so you may have already touched on this...

Do you have any thoughts as to who, outside of Moses, may be the writer of Genesis?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can any WPF'rs explain: pepper WPF News 165 12-16-2008 01:21 PM
Top Ten Lesser Known Arguments for the Existence o mizpeh Fellowship Hall 3 01-31-2008 12:27 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.