|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
06-06-2008, 02:59 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,867
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTULLOCK
Sure, once someone that is interesting and theologial shows up..lol
|
|
06-06-2008, 03:28 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,287
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4
Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates?
|
Sure, 1C why not?
Not theological but give me some good input on this anomaly. We have posters on here worried about plunging necklines and rising hems. Hairdo's and hairdon't's. Nail polish or non. Make-up or paleface. And "such like". People are offended and disturbed by actions that are open to question and debate as to whether they are truly wrong.
But those same people will quote from a King James Bible where the eternal name [Yahweh] of God has been replaced with LORD 6,828 times! If you change the wording in the UPCI manual by one word it genders hours and days of debate, but the living, and inspired, Word of God is changed egregiously, and no one even cares. Why is that?
By the way, I'm not nor do I espouse the doctrines of the sacred name people. Just for your reference so we don't get off course here. Do we strain at gnats and end up swallowing the whole camel?
Raven
|
06-06-2008, 06:40 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,848
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4
Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates?
|
Absolutely not. I am for boring theological debates.
|
06-06-2008, 07:27 PM
|
 |
Accepts all friends requests
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Corinth2v4
|
What's with that heretical looking avatar of yours?
|
06-06-2008, 08:08 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 177
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico
Yes. I want to know if fat meat really is greasy.
|
Sure it is! That's where all the flavor is!
|
06-06-2008, 08:09 PM
|
 |
Forever Loved Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
What's with that heretical looking avatar of yours?
|
He supports their candidate for the presidency. 
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
|
06-06-2008, 08:31 PM
|
 |
Jellybean!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,996
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosby48
Sure it is! That's where all the flavor is!
|
Aaaallll the fat is the Lord's!
I can't get that voice out of my head! (Bro. Mooney, early 90's sermon) 
__________________
 'Some folk don't understand that the middle "F" in AFF is the most important ingredient!' -noeticknight |
06-06-2008, 11:46 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,794
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven
Sure, 1C why not?
Not theological but give me some good input on this anomaly. We have posters on here worried about plunging necklines and rising hems. Hairdo's and hairdon't's. Nail polish or non. Make-up or paleface. And "such like". People are offended and disturbed by actions that are open to question and debate as to whether they are truly wrong.
But those same people will quote from a King James Bible where the eternal name [Yahweh] of God has been replaced with LORD 6,828 times! If you change the wording in the UPCI manual by one word it genders hours and days of debate, but the living, and inspired, Word of God is changed egregiously, and no one even cares. Why is that?
By the way, I'm not nor do I espouse the doctrines of the sacred name people. Just for your reference so we don't get off course here. Do we strain at gnats and end up swallowing the whole camel?
Raven
|
The imagined "change" in the bible does NOT change the meaning of the text. It is stated by the translators that LORD in all capitals is used to REPRESENT that name. Not replace it or change the meaning of the text
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
06-07-2008, 12:07 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
[QUOTE=The Mrs;487503]Aaaallll the fat is the Lord's!
If this is true I'm all his 
|
06-07-2008, 08:16 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,287
|
|
|
Re: Anyone For Any Interesting Theological Debates
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
The imagined "change" in the bible does NOT change the meaning of the text. It is stated by the translators that LORD in all capitals is used to REPRESENT that name. Not replace it or change the meaning of the text
|
Prax
That's a weak answer and a man of your intelligence knows it. We wouldn't stand for that if they did that with anything else, such as ..... the name of Jesus in the New Testament. By replacing the name with a title we place another "degree of separation" between God and man. Another veil of separation between a God who desires to get closer to us, not further away. I appreciate your response but I thought it was 1Cor who wanted a discussion. Where is he?
Raven
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
